On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:57:03 +0530
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Easier to ask – why do other RIRs not have nearly the same high
> quantum of such issues?
> What do they do to prevent these, and reclaim resources allocated to
> bogus entities?
>
I do not think that RIPE "has" to do anything. We
Easier to ask – why do other RIRs not have nearly the same high quantum of such
issues?
What do they do to prevent these, and reclaim resources allocated to bogus
entities?
--srs
On 15/08/16, 8:56 PM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of ox"
wrote:
Unauthorized access is NOT ABUSE, in terms of
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:29:56 -0700
Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 8/14/2016 1:08 PM, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 09:15:19PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> >>> The use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of
> >>> another resource
> >> I like this.
> > I...don't.
> In thi
The use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of
another resource
>>>
>>> I like this.
>>
>> I...don't.
>>
>> It is a meaningless political expression that can mean anything
>> to anyone.
>
> I think this comment goes to the heart of the challenge, here. This
> group is focuse
On 8/14/2016 1:08 PM, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 09:15:19PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
The use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of
another resource
I like this.
I...don't.
It is a meaningless political expression that can mean anything
to anyone. Nothin
net communications are not secure and the firm does not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
of the firm.
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information. You must not, directly or
indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message
if you are not the intended recipient.
#
#
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by NetIQ MailMarshal
#
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160815/f31e1a47/attachment.html>
End of anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 58, Issue 21
*
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:22:36 +
Erik Bais wrote:
> Hi Andre,
> What I tried to explain ( sorry for not being brief ..) :
> Abuse in certain cases, might be good or wrong in the eye of the
> beholder ... depending on their point of view and the goal to
> achieve.
> "What is normal for the
Hi Andre,
> Latest version is:
> The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of
> another resource
What I tried to explain ( sorry for not being brief ..) :
Abuse in certain cases, might be good or wrong in the eye of the beholder ...
depending on their point o
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:54:17 +
Erik Bais wrote:
> Hi Andre,
Hello Erik,
> > Definition of Abuse as it should be defined by RIPE
> > -
> > The use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of another
> > resource
>
La
Hi Andre,
> Definition of Abuse as it should be defined by RIPE
> -
> The use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of another resource
The core of the problem of a good definition of abuse, is the intend of the
acti
Unsubscribe me please
Eoin C. Bairéad
IT
Mazars
Block 3 The Harcourt Centre
Charlotte Street
Dublin 2
phone: +353 (1) 4494490
fax: +353 (1) 4750089
mobile: +353 (87) 2311357
#
Internet communications are not secu
11 matches
Mail list logo
