"I don't disagree that there are legitimate situations where LIR contracttermination could be justified, but non-compliance with a relativelyminor bureaucratic tickbox operation is not one of them."Providing an operational abuse email inbox, to deal with a complaint about a host that is on a fibre
the RIPE NCC "may close"
sorry
De : CLEMENT Herve IMT/OLN
Envoyé : mercredi 24 janvier 2018 16:21
À : 'Nick Hilliard'; Brian Nisbet
Cc : Gert Doering; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Objet : RE: [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] 2017-02 Review Phase (Regular
abuse-c Validation)
Hello Nick,
Hello Nick,
You say that:
" Secondly, there is no RIPE Community policy that I'm aware of which mandates
LIR termination for anything, and certainly not for minor issues like this."
But the ripe-680 "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE
NCC Service Region" explicitly
Brian Nisbet wrote:
> No, it isn't. It's a statement that the process has many steps and that
> the NCC both say they do and clearly do whatever they can to not reach
> the termination point of the process. I'm not saying it could never
> happen, I'm saying that it if happens it's may have been
Hi all,
Following comments received after the publication of the "review phase" 2017-02
policy proposal, please find answers we would like to address:
-On the question if the suggested implementation is in line with our
intend for this proposal, based on our presentation during RIPE
