Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )

2019-03-10 Thread ac
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:33:47 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: > In message , > Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: > >RIPE members and NCC staff should have the ability to face their > >accuser, but if they're hiding behind a veil of anonymity that's > >problematic. Personally I also find it ve

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )

2019-03-10 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: >RIPE members and NCC staff should have the ability to face their accuser, >but if they're hiding behind a veil of anonymity that's problematic. >Personally I also find it very hard to engage in any meaningful debate with >"someone" if I have ab

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?

2019-03-10 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <9793c47c-2c44-47e3-033a-1d60ca4d3...@time-travellers.org>, Shane Kerr wrote: >As far as I know there is nothing in any policy about decommissioning >resources. (I'm not even sure what that would mean in practice...) > >I don't think that such a proposal would get consensus in the