Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Anti-Abuse Training: Questions for the WG

2021-10-22 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <26f1df33-b958-bed4-f748-f82324d0b...@tana.it>, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >Shouldn't there be a standard for automatically forwarding messages destined >to abuse-c following a path similar to that of RFC 2317 delegations? I'd love >if AA training encouraged such behavior. Although

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Anti-Abuse Training: Questions for the WG

2021-10-22 Thread Ángel González Berdasco
Hello all > Shouldn't there be a standard for automatically forwarding messages > destined to abuse-c following a path similar to that of RFC 2317 > delegations? I'd love if AA training encouraged such behavior. I don't think the standard should be for automatically forwarding messages. You

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Anti-Abuse Training: Questions for the WG

2021-10-22 Thread Alessandro Vesely
Hi all, On Mon 18/Oct/2021 18:40:06 +0200 Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg wrote: 3) If not, would there be other areas of Anti-Abuse training that would be of interest? A lot of hosting providers aren’t LIRs, but are getting IP space from LIRs. Maybe providing materials