Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database

2015-11-05 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
Hi Elvis, > > I like the idea. I would have preffered a cross registry/RIR solution but > as you said, it has been many months (I actually raised the issue 2 RIPE > meetings ago - in London) but nothing visible has been done to fix this > problem. > > +1 from me. > I raised similar kind of issue

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))

2015-11-02 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
> >Yes it is easy.. but not scalable, exception rate would be very high.. > > Forgive me, but this opinion is based on what, exactly? > > And what exactly are we talking about when we say "exception"? > I could be wrong in this assumption. So lets ask RIPE NCC (secretariat) how many bounce email t

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))

2015-11-02 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
Hi Jeffrey, On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 at 13:21 Jeffrey Race wrote: > This is trivially and virtually costlessly done in an automated way, > taking about a day of a good programmer's time. Thereafter > zero/minimal maintenance except for 'exception' followups. > > One informs registrants that CONTI