Re: [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Abusing the Abuse contact check

2021-05-04 Thread Andreas Worbs via anti-abuse-wg
Yep, we'd seen this behavior as well for a handful of our customers Am 03.05.21 um 11:42 schrieb Gert Doering: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 10:07:08AM +0100, Nuno Vieira via anti-abuse-wg wrote: >> ## >> "The email address i

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] About whitelisting (was: UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget)

2021-03-05 Thread Andreas Worbs via anti-abuse-wg
I feel the same. You cannot be neutral if you charge for a delisting. Moreover it's obvious that the charging for delisting is there business modell. 89CHF (about 80€) for a single ip in Level-1?! 249CHF Level-2 and 449CHF Level-3. Sorry Esa, that's not a small fee. And even if they would charge a

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget

2021-03-03 Thread Andreas Worbs via anti-abuse-wg
There are plenty of blacklists and there is no need to "support" just those two. So i totally agree that the RIPE should expand the list or remove it Am 03.03.21 um 12:31 schrieb Nuno Vieira via anti-abuse-wg: > Hi. > > Let me disagree on this misconcept of "endorsement" or "reference" or > "repo