a whitelisting done (possibly for a (relatively small) fee).
Personally I'd prefer to have an option of 2. Having a small fee would
motivate me to talk with the hosting provider first, to get their act
together.
Let's forget how UCEPROTECT is messing up, let's discuss this as a
pri
he browser tab once I was routed to their payment provider.
>
This indeed puts the uceprotect in a different category in my books.
Please forget what I wrote earlier in this chain.
Yours
esa
--
Mr Esa Laitinen
IM: https://threema.id/2JP4Y33R or https://signal.org/install
Skype: reunaesa
Mobile: +4178 838 57 77
is completely unacceptable and I strongly recommend that RIPE
> distances itself as far as it can from these people - as a minimum,
> please stop using or referring to this blacklist in any way.
Yes, this was definitely bad form. I have no problem making fun of
cartooneys, but putting sexist
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 18:36 , wrote:
>
> Those "Escalation Listings" cause big problems and there is no
> independent board of arbitration which could bring a solution in such
> cases.
>
You already admitted you're providing services to users that don't obey
your ToS, and who are involved in abuse
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, 15:47 , wrote:
>
> It is true that VPN services which don't log any user activities attract
> people with bad intentions and believe me: We are not happy about that
> either...but we have to live with that
As per your own admission, you have to live with people abusing your
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:05 AM ac wrote:
> HTTPS protocol, by design, is secure and private.
>
> The average consumer expects this to be true.
>
> Google had to actually go and change, in an "under cover" way, the
> entire way and method that HTTPS works. This "change" is being sold as
> a "good
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:49 AM ox wrote:
>
> As I said: All ethical, honest and functional blocklists lists Twitter
> as a Spammer. - It seems that at least 25% do actually list Twitter as a
> spammer, and that is quite a lot. So maybe there is hope after all?
>
While I can certainly believe T
Sorry, I just couldn't resist. I know better, but
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:05 AM HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker <
sv...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> don't like the activities of some entities on the internet? 1: figure out
> who they are, if -need be- get a court order against their isp to fork up
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:19 PM HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker <
sv...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> also it's quite vague that when some mossadis rent servers and run an
> espionage botnet on it (which we happily intercept ourselves ofcourse) -
> spamhaus somehow magically never lists -that-.. just
pologize.
I'll go back lurking. I don't wish nanaesque behaviour to come back, there
is enough of that already in the social media.
esa
--
Mr Esa Laitinen
Skype: reunaesa
Yahoo: reunaesa
Mobile: +4178 838 57 77
rs leaving.
esa
--
Mr Esa Laitinen
Skype: reunaesa
Yahoo: reunaesa
Mobile: +4178 838 57 77
s. Even
> small LIRs can have many hundreds. Is the idea that they employ
> someone full-time to solve captchas for the NCC (another idea
> from this discussion)?
> Frankly, I'd rather have the spam, at least I can filter that.
>
> rgds,
> Sascha Luck
>
>
--
Mr Esa Laitinen
Skype: reunaesa
Yahoo: reunaesa
Mobile: +4178 838 57 77
12 matches
Mail list logo
