Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )

2019-03-10 Thread ac
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:33:47 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: > In message , > Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: > >RIPE members and NCC staff should have the ability to face their > >accuser, but if they're hiding behind a veil of anonymity that's > >problematic. Personally I also find it ve

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )

2019-03-10 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: >RIPE members and NCC staff should have the ability to face their accuser, >but if they're hiding behind a veil of anonymity that's problematic. >Personally I also find it very hard to engage in any meaningful debate with >"someone" if I have ab

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )

2019-03-08 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight
Brian I agree with you on most points, however I do have issues with the one regarding anonymity. If someone is going to come onto this list and start casting aspersions at RIPE members, RIPE NCC staff etc., which has happened more than once and seems to be trend, then I do not see why they sh

[anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )

2019-03-08 Thread Brian Nisbet
Folks, We aim for constructive discussion on the mailing list at all times and I would ask everyone to bear this in mind. I very much agree with " We make this a better world by helping with advice that empowers, not with diminish comments." I would also point out that there is no requirement