> >Yes it is easy.. but not scalable, exception rate would be very high..
>
> Forgive me, but this opinion is based on what, exactly?
>
> And what exactly are we talking about when we say "exception"?
>
I could be wrong in this assumption. So lets ask RIPE NCC (secretariat) how
many bounce email t
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:42:33 +, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
>Exactly *what* purpose would a phone call or fax (why not TELEX
>if we're doing retro tech?) serve?
Precisely to establish that the registrant humanly responds to
messages at its published addresses. The registrar would have
to employ
On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 02:31:26 +, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
>Yes it is easy.. but not scalable, exception rate would be
>very high.. multiply that with 7000+ (members)
It's not a problem for the registrar!!No human effort is
required at all so the registrar incurs no costs except setting
the
In message
Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
>Yes it is easy.. but not scalable, exception rate would be very high..
Forgive me, but this opinion is based on what, exactly?
And what exactly are we talking about when we say "exception"?
Are we talking about contact phone numbers that don't work anymore
b
It hasn't worked worth being able to trust any LIR fed data so far over the
past few years that we've had iterations of this discussion on this wg
I will let Ron continue repeating himself and you can continue to advocate for
"we are not the Internet police"
--srs
> On 03-Nov-2015, at 8:12 AM,
Jeffrey Race wrote:
>This is easy stuff.
I agree that it isn't at all hard, thank you for supporting the
point I was attempting to make, anmd complement you for the clever
addition of the "continuously working" requirement, and the idea
of automated, time-randomized spot checking. Ingeneous
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:06:56AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
wrote:
It needn't be done except as an additional verification step for
new asns and suspect ones
Sigh. Having an ASN assigned involves exchange of signed
contracts between sponsoring LIR and end-user. These, as well as
company re
It needn't be done except as an additional verification step for new asns and
suspect ones
--srs
> On 03-Nov-2015, at 8:01 AM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
>
> Yes it is easy.. but not scalable, exception rate would be very high..
> multiply that with 7000+ (members)
Hi Jeffrey,
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 at 13:21 Jeffrey Race wrote:
> This is trivially and virtually costlessly done in an automated way,
> taking about a day of a good programmer's time. Thereafter
> zero/minimal maintenance except for 'exception' followups.
>
> One informs registrants that CONTI
This is trivially and virtually costlessly done in an automated way,
taking about a day of a good programmer's time. Thereafter
zero/minimal maintenance except for 'exception' followups.
One informs registrants that CONTINUOUSLY working
contact modes (e-mail, fax, phone, postal, say at least
10 matches
Mail list logo
