Title: Message
Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------------------------
Europe Ponders New Force for Macedonia

NATO Reluctant to Extend Its Mandate After Rebels' Weapons Are Collected

By Keith B. Richburg
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, September 7, 2001; Page A20

PARIS, Sept. 6 -- European diplomats and military planners have concluded that some kind of foreign troop presence in Macedonia will probably be needed after the NATO disarmament mission there ends late this month. Otherwise, they fear, the Balkan country's shaky peace deal could unravel and civil strife may resume.

Officially, NATO is still committed to ending its operation based on a strict 30-day deadline, once weapons have been collected from ethnic Albanian insurgents and Macedonia's parliament approves a new power-sharing accord.

But in European capitals, the question has largely moved on from whether there will be a post-NATO presence to what kind, under what flag, for what duration, and with what mandate. Among the options is a force assembled by the European Union or United Nations.

The U.S. position on what could become a third long-term peacekeeping force in the Balkans remains unclear. But a Bush administration official said today that Washington might be willing to continue the logistical support it is giving to the disarmament mission.

"What is clear is that the European Union and the international community will remain engaged in Macedonia," said a spokeswoman for Javier Solana, the EU's foreign policy chief. "The discussion of flags depends on what needs to be done." She said that there was no European agreement yet on what to do.

The 4,000 NATO troops now in Macedonia are led by a British contingent. The force has already taken custody of about 1,100 of the 3,300 weapons the rebels have declared they have. Today the Macedonian parliament, after days of divisive debate, voted to begin constitutional changes aimed at increasing ethnic Albanian rights; under the peace plan, the rebels are meant to respond to that vote by handing over to NATO the second of three installments of 1,100 weapons.

The end of the collection is supposed to set off a lengthy reconciliation process to be monitored by observers from the European Union and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Those observers will be unarmed in a potentially still dangerous country, raising the question of who will provide for their security.

This week the U.S. envoy for Macedonia, James Pardew, told BBC Radio that under the peace agreement, the monitors "would not be armed, and that does raise the question . . . whether there should be an extension of the military mandate."

The Bush administration official said the focus now is on ensuring that the current operation is completed successfully. But there is no reason why the intelligence, airlift and logistical support the United States is now providing could not be continued if necessary, the official said.

"I haven't heard anyone say -- absolutely no way, no how," the official said, adding that consultations must take place with NATO to "see what's required."

A senior Defense Department official said that so far no one at the Pentagon had been asked to consider a contribution to a peacekeeping force in Macedonia.

NATO remains publicly opposed to extending its operation, called Essential Harvest. It is reluctant to be dragged into another open-ended stay in the Balkans. NATO now leads 20,000 peacekeeping troops in Bosnia and another 40,000 in Kosovo with no prospects for an early exit.

The guerrillas in Macedonia have let it be known they want NATO troops to stay to help protect the minority ethnic Albanian communities from a feared government assault, and one rebel leader threatened to remobilize if the Western troops pull out. Macedonia's hard-line interior minister, Ljube Boskovski, has hinted of a new crackdown after the NATO arms-collection mission.

According to reports from Macedonia today, British troops intervened to prevent a paramilitary unit of Macedonian Slavs from clashing with armed ethnic Albanian civilians, following an incident in which an ethnic Albanian police officer was fired on.

One frequently mentioned idea is for forces from interested countries -- a "coalition of the willing" -- to be deployed using NATO assets, so the mission would not technically be a NATO operation.

The most concrete proposal so far has come from the EU representative for Macedonia, Francois Leotard, who was quoted during a visit to Moscow as calling for a pan-European force of 1,500 troops and saying he had already suggested the idea to several European countries. But a top EU diplomat cautioned that there is no decision.

Another option might be for the United Nations to replace NATO in a security role. Francois Heisbourg, a French defense expert, recalled how the world body's 1,100-member Preventive Deployment Force helped keep Balkans violence out of Macedonia in the 1990s.

Foreign ministers will meet informally this weekend in Brussels to begin talks on several possibilities.

In the meantime, political leaders from NATO countries are hedging about what will come next. Jack Straw, the British foreign secretary, visited Macedonia last week and said the plan was still for the troops to leave once the rebel arms were collected. But he added: "Nothing, particularly in the Balkans, is inevitable. If you are asking me whether that NATO decision may change, well, it could change."

"There's almost a consensus that there will be a need for a continuing international presence -- the question is which one," said a Danish Foreign Ministry official. Among the unknown factors weighing on any decision, he said, was how the situation develops on the ground in Macedonia. A Danish general commands the current mission.

Col. Konrad Freytag, a spokesman for the Allied headquarters in Brussels, said in a telephone interview that NATO was ready to do what its governments decided. "We tell our political masters, 'If you want us to do something after 30 days, tell us soon.' "

Staff writer Vernon Loeb contributed to this report from Washington.

© 2001 The Washington Post Company


-------------------------------------------------
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been shut down
==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to