HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------
---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
--- Begin Message ---
-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Oct. 17, 2002
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------
NOT A SPEECH BUT A DIATRIBE: BUSH BUILDS A WAR ON
LIES
By Fred Goldstein
President George W. Bush's speech in Cincinnati on Oct. 7
was designed to build momentum for Washington's planned war
of aggression against Iraq. The speech contained an almost
uninterrupted stream of lies, vilification and appeals to
fear and threats, all couched as "arguments" to answer his
so-called critics.
Bush repeated his insinuation, made over and over again in
other speeches, that the Iraqi government was somehow tied
to the Sept. 11 attack. These insinuations were made without
one iota of evidence.
Bush reiterated the charge, denied by the Iraqi government,
that Baghdad was producing biological and chemical weapons-
again without any evidence. He repeated the charge that Iraq
was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon with which
to threaten the United States. No evidence supplied.
Bush again implied that Iraq had expelled weapons
inspectors, when in fact it was the U.S. that had the
weapons inspectors withdrawn in 1998, prior to the bombing
of Iraq in operation Desert Fox. Iraq refused later to
readmit the inspectors because the inspection team was being
directed by Washington to violate the terms of the
inspection regime by probing for military information that
could be used by the Pentagon in an attack.
SPEECH IGNORES IRAQI CONCESSIONS
Bush completely left out of his talk the monumental fact
that Iraq has made the major concession of agreeing to
unfettered weapons inspections of the country by the UN. Not
only did Iraq announce this concession, it followed it up by
working out a detailed agreement with Hans Blix, head of the
UN weapons inspection team, including arrangements to
inspect government buildings like the headquarters of the
Republican Guard and the Defense Ministry building, among
others.
This agreement was torn up by U.S. Secretary of State Colin
Powell on the grounds that it was based on a 1998 UN
resolution specifying that the inspection of presidential
sites had to be announced in advance and accompanied by an
Iraqi official. The Iraqi government then stated it would
allow unannounced inspection of presidential sites.
Bush had the audacity to accuse the Iraqis of aggression for
firing back in self-defense at U.S. and British war planes
that illegally violate its air space every single day. They
fly in the so-called "no-fly zones" and fire at will on
Iraqi targets, killing many civilians in the process. These
"no-fly zones" were simply declared by Washington in
violation of all international law.
By launching an uninterrupted stream of baseless charges--
while omitting any reference to Iraqi concessions--Bush made
it clear that there is no condition that the Iraqi
government can meet, short of resigning and turning over the
government to a U.S.-puppet regime, that will satisfy the
White House and prevent the Pentagon from launching an
unprovoked war of imperialist aggression.
Bush's hypocrisy could not have been clearer. On the same
day that he was beating the drums of war against Iraq for
"supporting terrorism" and seeking "weapons of mass
destruction," U.S. imperialism's client state of Israel--the
only nuclear power in the Middle East--launched a massive
invasion upon the densely populated refugee camp of Khan
Yunis in Gaza, using tanks and helicopters. They fired a
missile into a crowded street, killing 13 Palestinian
civilians, including children. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
declared the operation to be a "great success."
BUSH LINES UP CONGRESS
Bush's immediate political goal was to add momentum to the
vote for military intervention about to take place in
Congress. This vote, in turn, is meant to strong-arm the UN
Security Council and let them know that whatever they do or
say, Washington is going to invade.
The first victory of the Bush administration in lining up
the political establishment for the new "unilateralism" of
the Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz grouping came in
the struggle over a joint congressional resolution on the
war.
This victory was attained on Oct. 2 when House Minority
Leader Dick Gephardt, a Democrat from Missouri, stepped
forward to embrace the Bush resolution. He was photographed
along with the Republican supporters of Bush announcing the
deal on the White House steps.
The joint resolution is titled "Authorization for the Use of
Military Force Against Iraq." Its preamble declares that "it
should be the policy of the United States to support efforts
to remove from power the current Iraqi regime."
The body of the resolution declares that "The Congress of
the United States supports the efforts by the president to
strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council
all relevant Security Council resolutions applicable to Iraq
and encourages him in those efforts." It goes on to
"encourage" the president to "obtain decisive action by the
Security Council."
It then concludes that "the president is authorized to use
the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines
necessary to (1) defend the national security of the United
States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2)
enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council
Resolutions regarding Iraq."
It requires that the failure of diplomatic measure be
reported by Bush to the House of Representatives 48 hours
after (!) an invasion takes place.
In other words, this resolution tells the French
imperialists, the Russian capitalists, the Chinese
government that they will have no say whatsoever in the
matter of a U.S. war against Iraq. This resolution tells the
world that U.S. imperialism reserves the right to and fully
intends to destroy a sovereign government in Baghdad without
anyone else's permission, and that the political
establishment of the ruling class is overwhelmingly united
in its readiness to support the war.
As for the other imperialists in Paris, Berlin and Rome,
they had better line up or be left out. And for those who
were counting upon the imperialist allies to slow down
Bush's rush to war, they should forget it and get on board.
The speech was calculated to cover up the fundamental fact
that an imperialist super-power--with a population of 280
million, an economy of $10 trillion, and a military
establishment larger than the next 20 countries in the world-
-is planning an unprovoked invasion of a poor country of 20
million, formerly dominated by colonial powers, whose
economy and military machine have been devastated by U.S.
invasion and 11 years of deadly sanctions, and which has 110
billion barrels of oil on its territory, coveted by the
giant oil monopolies.
The war talk is also calculated to distract the population
at home from the fact that the stock market is crashing in
slow motion; retirement funds of the masses are being wiped
out as their 401k plans evaporate; 435,000 more workers were
laid off in manufacturing in September; and millions of
workers are no longer counted in the work force because they
have given up looking for jobs or are living on paltry
disability incomes.
Bush's speech was also meant to counteract the diminishing
support for the war in the polls and the rising active
opposition of the budding anti-war movement.
A Gallup poll released on Oct. 7, as reported in the
Washington Post of Oct. 8, "found a bare majority of
Americans-53 percent-favored a ground invasion of Iraq, down
from 61 percent in June and 74 percent last November." These
conservative numbers show the clear trend of plummeting
support, as the suffering of the people increases and the
alarmist rhetoric of the Bush administration,
unsubstantiated by any substance, seems more and more
hollow.
It is highly significant that the Bush war talk has clearly
awakened the beginnings of a new and vigorous anti-war
movement. The tens of thousands who turned out around the
country on Oct. 6 to protest the Bush war plans show that
the movement is overcoming the mood of retreat that took
hold after Sept. 11 and is gathering forward momentum. It
shows that a new generation of youth is preparing to resist
the militarist adventurism emanating from Washington.
The massive support that is growing for the Oct. 26 national
demonstration in Washington, D.C., along with a simultaneous
activity in San Francisco, holds out the greatest hope that
a revival of the struggle against imperialist war can spread
to the workers and the oppressed, can really challenge the
capitalist war makers and can push back the war drive.
- END -
(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the voice of
resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)
------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- End Message ---