HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------




   Now that the mouthpieces of neo-imperialism have outlived their use, 
it is time for them to taste life under a neo-colonialist, system of 
"democracy".  And as a result, I can't help but laugh my head off at 
them!


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> --part1_99.2dba247d.2ad521f5_alt_boundary
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> In a message dated 10/7/02 3:03:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> writes:
> 
> 
> > SERBIA: GOVERNMENT SEEKS MEDIA MONOPOLY
> > 
> > Serbian authorities block media reforms to keep down independent TV
> > station and prop up former Milosevic mouthpieces that now support them.
> > 
> > By Milanka Saponja Hadzic in Belgrade
> > 
> > Press groups close to Serbia's prime minister Zoran Djindjic have been
> > attacking the country's leading independent radio and television station
> > as part of a government drive to retain the virtual media monopoly it
> > inherited from the Milosevic regime.
> > 
> > The attacks began in mid-September, when the pro-government private
> > television stations BK and Pink used prime time news slots to accuse 
> > Radio
> > Television B92 bosses of privatising the company without the employees'
> > knowledge and to their disadvantage.
> > 
> > Belgrade media last week received unsigned letters allegedly written by
> > anonymous B92 employees accusing their bosses of abusing the company's
> > privatisation process. BK and Pink, the two largest private broadcasters
> > in Serbia, which were once very close to the Milosevic regime, quoted
> > these accusations in their leading news broadcasts.
> > 
> > In the latest salvo against the station on October 4, hundreds of 
> > posters
> > appeared overnight in Belgrade with the picture of Matic and the logo of
> > B92.  Underneath it was written "Caught Stealing".
> > 
> > B92 editor Veran Matic dismissed the claims, and IWPR has seen a copy of
> > the minutes of a station staff meeting, in which it's clear that most
> > employees agreed with the method of privatisation proposed by the
> > management.
> > 
> > Matic charged the authorities with attempting to block B92's from having
> > national coverage.  Under American pressure, the authorities agreed two
> > months ago to allocate the station temporary frequencies, enabling its
> > television arm to cover 55 per cent of Serbian territory.
> > 
> > Media analysts believe the government is fighting to retain as much of 
> > the
> > press monopoly it inherited from Milosevic as it can, with independent
> > media such as B92 seen threatening this goal.
> > 
> > At home and abroad, the station is widely regarded as a symbol of
> > democracy and independence, and was repeatedly closed and banned by the
> > former regime.
> > 
> > TV Pink and BK Television, owned by owned by Zeljko Mitrovic and 
> > Bogoljub
> > Karic respectively, meanwhile acted as mouthpieces for Milosevic, only 
> > to
> > switch sides as soon as he was ousted.
> > 
> > The two stations are most important to the Serbian authorities as they
> > reach audiences well beyond Belgrade.  Between them, their broadcasts
> > cover 90 per cent of Yugoslav territory, netting huge profits from
> > advertising.
> > 
> > The Serbian government, in an attempt to preserve its media monopoly, is
> > dragging its feet over implementing some press reforms, including TV
> > frequency regulations and a system of public inspection. Many believe 
> > the
> > former was only adopted because it was a precondition for Yugoslavia's
> > accession to the Council of Europe.
> > 
> > As a consequence, the media that once served Milosevic have kept their
> > privileged positions and their national frequencies, while the stations
> > that fought hardest for democratic change are deliberately confined to a
> > limited viewing audience.
> > 
> > Matic said the situation was ironic, "The media that are an authentic 
> > part
> > of the democratic changes in this country and a symbol of independent
> > journalism are still being discriminated against because they don't have
> > radio and television frequencies."
> > 
> > In a separate development, the new authorities have done nothing to put 
> > a
> > stop to a wave of legal cases against reporters who fought against the
> > wars of the 1990s, the politics of hatred and are now campaigning for
> > professional journalistic standards.
> > 
> > Some 300 such cases are currently going through the courts, with many of
> > the reporters being sued by the former regime's associates and members 
> > of
> > the ruling coalition.
> > 
> > This month, for example, an official in Djindjic's Democratic Party,
> > Radoslav Ljubisavljevic, charged B92 with libel after the station 
> > reported
> > that he had been handed a two-year suspended sentence in 1994 for 
> > forgery
> > and abuse of power.
> > 
> > Ljubisavljevic did not dispute the report's facts, but sued B92 for
> > "mental anguish".  "What really hurts Ljubisavljevic is the truth", the
> > Association of Independent Electronic Media commented.
> > 
> > Milka Saponja Hadzic is a freelance journalist in Serbia
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --part1_99.2dba247d.2ad521f5_alt_boundary
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> <HTML>
> 
> <FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" 
> LANG="0">In a message dated 10/7/02 3:03:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:<BR>
> <BR>
> <BR>
> <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; 
> MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">SERBIA: 
> GOVERNMENT SEEKS MEDIA MONOPOLY<BR>
> <BR>
> Serbian authorities block media reforms to keep down independent TV<BR>
> station and prop up former Milosevic mouthpieces that now support 
> them.<BR>
> <BR>
> By Milanka Saponja Hadzic in Belgrade<BR>
> <BR>
> Press groups close to Serbia's prime minister Zoran Djindjic have 
> been<BR>
> attacking the country's leading independent radio and television 
> station<BR>
> as part of a government drive to retain the virtual media monopoly 
> it<BR>
> inherited from the Milosevic regime.<BR>
> <BR>
> The attacks began in mid-September, when the pro-government private<BR>
> television stations BK and Pink used prime time news slots to accuse 
> Radio<BR>
> Television B92 bosses of privatising the company without the 
> employees'<BR>
> knowledge and to their disadvantage.<BR>
> <BR>
> Belgrade media last week received unsigned letters allegedly written 
> by<BR>
> anonymous B92 employees accusing their bosses of abusing the 
> company's<BR>
> privatisation process. BK and Pink, the two largest private 
> broadcasters<BR>
> in Serbia, which were once very close to the Milosevic regime, 
> quoted<BR>
> these accusations in their leading news broadcasts.<BR>
> <BR>
> In the latest salvo against the station on October 4, hundreds of 
> posters<BR>
> appeared overnight in Belgrade with the picture of Matic and the logo 
> of<BR>
> B92.  Underneath it was written "Caught Stealing".<BR>
> <BR>
> B92 editor Veran Matic dismissed the claims, and IWPR has seen a copy 
> of<BR>
> the minutes of a station staff meeting, in which it's clear that 
> most<BR>
> employees agreed with the method of privatisation proposed by the<BR>
> management.<BR>
> <BR>
> Matic charged the authorities with attempting to block B92's from 
> having<BR>
> national coverage.  Under American pressure, the authorities agreed 
> two<BR>
> months ago to allocate the station temporary frequencies, enabling 
> its<BR>
> television arm to cover 55 per cent of Serbian territory.<BR>
> <BR>
> Media analysts believe the government is fighting to retain as much of 
> the<BR>
> press monopoly it inherited from Milosevic as it can, with 
> independent<BR>
> media such as B92 seen threatening this goal.<BR>
> <BR>
> At home and abroad, the station is widely regarded as a symbol of<BR>
> democracy and independence, and was repeatedly closed and banned by 
> the<BR>
> former regime.<BR>
> <BR>
> TV Pink and BK Television, owned by owned by Zeljko Mitrovic and 
> Bogoljub<BR>
> Karic respectively, meanwhile acted as mouthpieces for Milosevic, only 
> to<BR>
> switch sides as soon as he was ousted.<BR>
> <BR>
> The two stations are most important to the Serbian authorities as 
> they<BR>
> reach audiences well beyond Belgrade.  Between them, their 
> broadcasts<BR>
> cover 90 per cent of Yugoslav territory, netting huge profits from<BR>
> advertising.<BR>
> <BR>
> The Serbian government, in an attempt to preserve its media monopoly, 
> is<BR>
> dragging its feet over implementing some press reforms, including TV<BR>
> frequency regulations and a system of public inspection. Many believe 
> the<BR>
> former was only adopted because it was a precondition for 
> Yugoslavia's<BR>
> accession to the Council of Europe.<BR>
> <BR>
> As a consequence, the media that once served Milosevic have kept 
> their<BR>
> privileged positions and their national frequencies, while the 
> stations<BR>
> that fought hardest for democratic change are deliberately confined to 
> a<BR>
> limited viewing audience.<BR>
> <BR>
> Matic said the situation was ironic, "The media that are an authentic 
> part<BR>
> of the democratic changes in this country and a symbol of 
> independent<BR>
> journalism are still being discriminated against because they don't 
> have<BR>
> radio and television frequencies."<BR>
> <BR>
> In a separate development, the new authorities have done nothing to put 
> a<BR>
> stop to a wave of legal cases against reporters who fought against 
> the<BR>
> wars of the 1990s, the politics of hatred and are now campaigning 
> for<BR>
> professional journalistic standards.<BR>
> <BR>
> Some 300 such cases are currently going through the courts, with many 
> of<BR>
> the reporters being sued by the former regime's associates and members 
> of<BR>
> the ruling coalition.<BR>
> <BR>
> This month, for example, an official in Djindjic's Democratic Party,<BR>
> Radoslav Ljubisavljevic, charged B92 with libel after the station 
> reported<BR>
> that he had been handed a two-year suspended sentence in 1994 for 
> forgery<BR>
> and abuse of power.<BR>
> <BR>
> Ljubisavljevic did not dispute the report's facts, but sued B92 for<BR>
> "mental anguish".  "What really hurts Ljubisavljevic is the truth", 
> the<BR>
> Association of Independent Electronic Media commented.<BR>
> <BR>
> Milka Saponja Hadzic is a freelance journalist in Serbia<BR>
> <BR>
> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
> <BR>
> </FONT>
> 
> 
> </HTML>
> --part1_99.2dba247d.2ad521f5_alt_boundary--
> 

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to