HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

-Well, this is it! 
----This is what? 
-The new year in the brand new century — a row of virginal 0s waiting
to be filled in. 
----So what? 
-So . . . so, it's time to take stock. 
----Of what? 
-Of where we are . . . who we are. History. 
----Bollocks! 

The first thing to realise is that history does not arrive at midnight,
like a rabbit out of a magician's hat. History makes nothing, brings
nothing, stands for nothing. History is social motion and the speed and
texture of that motion is made by men and women. We make it out of the
material environment that exists and in making it transform the
material environment and our own existence. We make our own future; it
does not arrive as hero or demon, but is the product of our own energy.


Secondly, there is a harsh truth to recognise. The battle to make the
future better than the past is about power, not ideals. We all want to
be happy, but happiness for Rupert Murdoch is achievable in a different
way than for a single mother in Brixton or Harlem. Murdoch needs to
hold on to his power and expand it. The single mother needs to gain
power. Murdoch has a class interest based upon the ownership and
control of property. 

The working-class interest is based upon its non-ownership and control
of property. Consciousness of these interests and organisation to
promote them is the key to changing history. So, the question is not
about what the future will bring, but about what we have the
intelligence and the political force to take for ourselves. 

Thirdly, the future is not a moment and is not Out There, like a “Star
Trek” story. It is a process in which the present second is always a
part. The beginning of the future starts with an understanding of where
one is. There are no solutions until the problem is recognised. The
complexities of our future are inextricably connected to the
contradictions of the present. That is why stargazers and prophets are
always faintly ridiculous, obsessed as they are by imagined destinies. 

WHAT’S  ROTTEN 

By 2100 it would be rather nice if the world could have seen the last
of 

Nation states — homely prison enclosures in which the inmates sing the
prison song and coloured rags fly overhead to remind you of which wing
you're in. 

Banks —  repositories of paper and metal tokens that people need in
order to buy existence. 

Sir Cliff Richard — the singing ayatollah of creepy Christendom who has
managed against all odds to put a tune to the act of fraud. 

Wages and salaries — the price on our heads, always less than the value
of what we produce, which are the stale air provided for the
semi-suffocated majority in a world where they produce much and possess
little. 

Telephone muzak — designed to drive us slowly mad while we wait to
speak to people we probably don't want to speak to about matters we'd
rather not be discussing. 

Charities — which redistribute poverty, enabling the abjectly poor to
benefit from the guilt of the moderately poor. 

America — the ultimate trash-empire, based on the principle that no-one
ever went broke by underestimating the intelligence of the inhabitants.


Markets — which are presented as channels of economic access, but are
obstacle courses which ration access in accordance with the callous
priority of profit accumulation. 

Lenin-worshippers — those insufferable lefties who see their role in
this world to lead the witless masses into a state dictatorship where
the Lenin-worshipers will become commissars. 

Hymns — see Cliff Richard. 

Government — the means whereby we are coerced into class regimentation
by the force of law. 

Socialists — a redundant label once the job is done. 

NEW  MILLENNIUM  --  NEW  SOCIAL  ORDER ? 

The biggest failure of the twentieth century was the failure of
humanity to grasp the need for a new social order based on need rather
than profit. The consequences have been devastating. The thought of
sustaining those consequences, embedded as they are in ever-increasing
contradictions of anarchic global capitalism, is not only uninspiring,
but deeply depressing. Although there is a prevailing political
illusion that Capitalism Has Won, there is a remarkable absence of
confidence, even among its supporters, in the capacity for humanising
the global market. 

The most pressing challenge this century will be to remove capitalism
and establish a new social order based upon 

·       Common ownership 
·       Democratic control 
·       Production solely for use 
·       Free access to all goods and services 

Such a system has never been tried. It conforms to the highest needs of
humanity to create a world where order is based upon equality,
friendship and freedom. It is humanity's objective in humanising its
social environment. 

There will be those who raise objections. They should. The most
important next step is that at least there should be debate. Others
will raise no objections, but continue to uphold the present system in
a state of inert, apathetic and cynical resignation. They are the
bulwarks of global capitalism which relies not upon enthusiastic
support but hopeless acquiescence. Shaking such hopelessness, and
offering what Raymond Williams called "resources of hope", may well be
the most important political task of our age. 

Jt

www.worldsocialism.org


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to