HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=6493674

The Times of India
April 11, 2002

US troops in Afghanistan for long haul: Minister 
AFP [ WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10, 2002  11:25:38 PM ] 
 
BAGRAM AIR BASE, Afghanistan: American troops will
keep a long-term presence in Afghanistan because they
have accomplished only one of their three strategic
objectives, US Army Secretary Thomas White said on
Wednesday. 

The minister told US soldiers during a visit to this
air base north of Kabul that the campaign had been
"enormously successful" but had yet to result in the
eradication of enemy resistance or the capture of
Osama bin Laden.

American troops have had little contact with remaining
diehard al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters in recent weeks
following the end of the massive Operation Anaconda
offensive in mid-March.

White refused to comment on troop numbers and
movements within Afghanistan but insisted that the
military's operational capability would be maintained.


Some 4,000 troops were at Bagram at the height of
Anaconda but the number has now fallen to around
2,000.

"We are in this for the long haul. The president has
been very clear about that and we will sustain the
operational capability here to pursue the campaign,"
the minister said.

"This is a long-term deal. We have had initial
success... but there's more to do. This is not a
short-haul operation, this is a long-term operation."

White said the first of the conflict's three main
strategic objectives had been achieved with the ouster
of the Taliban from power late last year.

But he said there was still work to do.

"The second strategic objective was to root out the
al-Qaeda network - we are doing that.

"(The) third one is to get bin Laden and we are
pursuing that. I think we have made enormous
progress."

Asked if the campaign could only be seen as a complete
success when bin Laden was captured, he replied: "No
one said it was going to be easy."

US President George W Bush announced that he wanted
bin Laden captured "dead or alive" in the immediate
aftermath of the September 11 terror attacks, which
the Saudi-born dissident is accused of masterminding. 

A 25-million-dollar bounty has been put on his head
but there have been no confirmed sightings of him
since the Taliban's ouster. 

White said the US troops had proved themselves the
world's finest and hinted they could have a role
beyond Afghanistan as part of the Bush
administration's stated global war on terrorism. 

"You will prove it again wherever in the world this
global war on terrorism takes us and however long it
takes us to be successful," he told the troops.

"Every American is proud of what you are doing. I have
never seen the American public so united behind us in
the way they are in the war against terrorism," he
added.

Earlier this week, US Defence Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld said American troops would remain in
Afghanistan until the Afghan national army was ready
to take over.

"You'd want to have an environment that was reasonably
hospitable to the government, people going about their
business, going to school, trade with other countries,
and that'll take a little time, I would think,"
Rumsfeld told a Pentagon press conference.

Pressed later on the prospect of war against Iraq,
White repeated Bush's claim that Saddam Hussein's
regime was part of an axis of evil, but said the
question of military action against Baghdad could only
be answered by Bush and Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld. 
 
 
 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to