> Sounds like an idea. The ideas currently on that page IMO do not scale
> > to a
> > grammar of any size.
>
> I am not sure what you mean by scale to be honest. Performing an upcase in
> LA isn't much of an overhead compared to everything else. I use this on my
> SQL grammars with no problems a
> Language L1-lives in a Java project, with grammar L1.g; usable
> > standalone
> > Language L2-lives in another Java project, with grammar L2.g;
> > extends L1
> Have you tried making your actual rules just imports such that L1.g
> contains no rules, but defines the headers and pa
Hi all,
I'm a long time user of ANTLR, and have recently gone through the painful
but definitely useful exercise of moving from v2 to v3.
I have now hit a point where I am stuck, with no workaround in sight, due to
the difference in grammar inheritance. This is the situation here - note, no
lexer
