On 15 Oct, Jim Wilcoxson wrote:
> After running 12 hours, we're seeing 28 nsd threads using 253MB. Does
> that still seem reasonable for memory usage? Our baseline for this
> server is 81MB right after the server starts with around 12 threads.
> This server handled 762K requests today, total (le
On 2001.10.15, Jim Wilcoxson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After running 12 hours, we're seeing 28 nsd threads using 253MB. Does
> that still seem reasonable for memory usage?
That's 9.0 MB per thread. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara mail: [E
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Dossy wrote:
> On 2001.10.15, Jim Wilcoxson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After running 12 hours, we're seeing 28 nsd threads using 253MB. Does
> That's 9.0 MB per thread. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
(What a world we live in, where 9MB in a thread -- a lightweight s
Just a quick note to anyone who's interested:
There's a version of NSSOAP in CVS on nssoap.sf.net - it's not
guaranteed to work, and it actually may not work at all, depending on
your version of libxml, etc. Hopefully we'll resolve some of those
issues soon.
It's not stable by any means, but
>After running 12 hours, we're seeing 28 nsd threads using 253MB. Does
>that still seem reasonable for memory usage? Our baseline for this
>server is 81MB right after the server starts with around 12 threads.
>This server handled 762K requests today, total (less than that in the
>12 hour period).
>
Hi All,
After a mail exchange with Dossy, I have an AOLServer 3.4 setup on Windows
2000 SP2, and running a MySQL database, and having problems...
I have installed the MySQL module in AOLServer, and even though everything
seems to be configured correctly, and the module files are in the correct
d
