Hi,
Work has me out of the country again all to regularly and with PG8 now
available for Windows, I'd like to move my development to my Windows only
(compnay) laptop so I can work on my personal projects when away from
home.
That leaves two issues for me: PostgeSQL driver and tdom. Has anyone tri
Thorpe Mayes said:
> I am not sure what happens next. Is there another way for me to
> accomplish what I want to do: provide a mechanism for users to upload a
> graphic using a web form?
Is there a real reason why you are not using 4.x? I use JPEG upload and
ImageMagick scripts on that with no issu
Hi Bas,
tDOM works with AOLserver on Windows, you can download the Win32 dll
version from tdom.org. (I haven't tried yesterday's 0.8.0 release yet.)
nspostgres compiles on Windows against libpq from PostgreSQL 7.4 with no
modifications, though IIRC you need a small change to make some of the b
Jamie Rasmussen said:
> tDOM works with AOLserver on Windows, you can download the Win32 dll
> version from tdom.org. (I haven't tried yesterday's 0.8.0 release yet.)
Cool, will give it a go.
> nspostgres compiles on Windows against libpq from PostgreSQL 7.4 with no
> modifications, though II
My recent adventures with AOLserver 4 have come to an end; we've seen
several instances of the site hanging with very high CPU consumption
and yesterday Dossy and Andrew (Grumet) traced it to the nsopenssl
module when it happened at Sloan. So for the time being I've gone back
to nsd3.3+ad13 and n
The connection was refused when attempting to contact www.scriptkitties.com
Is it on SF yet?
Nate
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:57:20 -0700, Daniel P. Stasinski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 17:41, Daniel P. Stasinski wrote:
> > My portion falls under the "u *shrugs shoulders*
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:12:15AM -0400, Janine Sisk wrote:
> I have two relatively busy, relatively graphics-intensive e-commerce
> sites on this system. They're based on ACS Classic 4.2, the last Tcl
> version put out by Arsdigita. It has unfortunately been "normal" all
> along for these site
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 08:06, Nathaniel Haggard wrote:
> The connection was refused when attempting to contact www.scriptkitties.com
> Is it on SF yet?
Lot's of log entries. You might have caught it during a reboot or
something.
Daniel
--
| --
On 2004.08.12, Janine Sisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS Unfortunately I can't upgrade to the new 3.5.11, as ACS sites rely
> on the Arsdigita patches
Do you know specifically what they rely on? I may be mistaken, but the
3.5.x releases were really a pre-4.0, or at least more close to 4.0.x
tha
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:26:03AM -0400, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> On 2004.08.12, Janine Sisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PS Unfortunately I can't upgrade to the new 3.5.11, as ACS sites rely
> > on the Arsdigita patches
>
> Do you know specifically what they rely on? I may be mistaken, but the
On Aug 12, 2004, at 11:26 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
On 2004.08.12, Janine Sisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PS Unfortunately I can't upgrade to the new 3.5.11, as ACS sites rely
on the Arsdigita patches
Do you know specifically what they rely on? I may be mistaken, but the
3.5.x releases were really
Hi,
I thought I would send my problem on this list and see if someone can
help me out.
I am working on Address Book on the Web (webmail.aol.com), and it has a
UI where you can select addresses to send mail to.
Its a paged UI in the sense that addresses are grouped into alpha
buckets, ABC, DEF
Automatic digest processor wrote on 8/11/2004, 11:01 PM:
> Has anyone tried to get the asp style ADP parser originally written in
> like 1999 or 2000 by some guys at AM Computers working with Aolserver
> 4? The source file was nsAspStyleAdps.c. It allowed conditional code
> throughout th
Is there a document anywhere listing the changes between AOLserver 3.x
and 4.x?We're still running 3.4.2 and we'd like to upgrade to 4.x,
but I have no good way of predicting how much of our code we'll need to
modify.
Thanks--
IRA
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself
--- IRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Automatic digest processor wrote on 8/11/2004, 11:01
> PM:
>
> > Has anyone tried to get the asp style ADP parser
> originally written in
> > like 1999 or 2000 by some guys at AM Computers
> working with Aolserver
> > 4? The source file was nsAspStyleAdp
I'd like to see such ability too but, in the meantime, have you
considered curly braces to avoid many of those issues?
Rob Seeger
if {$vlCountryCode == "DE"} {
ns_puts [subst {
http://www.aol.de/action_templates/globalhelp_1.jsp?cid=1041541";
target="top">
There is a list at
http://www.jamierasmussen.com/documents/programming/openacs/aolserver4_changes.adp
and that page links to some documentation for module authors. You can also
look at the notes for various 4.0 releases on the SourceForge files page. I
obviously forgot a few things, like the remo
On 2004.08.12, IRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Automatic digest processor wrote on 8/11/2004, 11:01 PM:
>
> > Has anyone tried to get the asp style ADP parser originally written in
> > like 1999 or 2000 by some guys at AM Computers working with Aolserver
> > 4? The source file was nsAspStyl
The installer at http://empoweringminds.mle.ie/openacs/ is old and has some
bugs that were fixed in later AOLserver 4 betas, though it should be
sufficient to get you started if I don't create a newer one first. The
binaries there were compiled with MS VC++ 6.0 I'm currently using MS VS.NET
2003,
On 2004.08.12, IRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a document anywhere listing the changes between AOLserver 3.x
> and 4.x?We're still running 3.4.2 and we'd like to upgrade to 4.x,
> but I have no good way of predicting how much of our code we'll need to
> modify.
Why predict? Set up a
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:00:06PM -0500, IRA wrote:
> It's just this sort of problem that makes me wonder if the people
> building aolserver ever actually USE aolserver to build web
> applications. It seems like not that big of a deal . . . until you
> realize that we do this ALL THE TIME.
> He
OK, so after all the buzz, I started doing some testing of nsopenssl 3
beta and here's what I've learned so far:
I'm using "OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004" and the latest checkout of
nsopenssl 3 beta from CVS HEAD.
1. If the certificate and key .pem files aren't in the modules/nsopenssl
dir, the s
There is a fundamental difference between GET and POST in that the former encodes your data into the URL whilst the latter incorporates the data into the message and posts it. If your submitting a lot of data then you could run into problems of url length with GET.
The following self-posting t
[12/Aug/2004:17:17:17][17642.1024][-main-] Notice: modload: loading
'/sm/aolserver4.0.7/bin/nsopenssl.so'
[12/Aug/2004:17:17:17][17642.1024][-main-] Notice: nsopenssl
(server1): loading SSL context 'users'
[12/Aug/2004:17:17:17][17642.1024][-main-] Notice: nsopenssl
(server1): 'users' ciphers loade
Steve,
I know the difference between GET and POST. My actual problem is that
POST is not posting form to the server, so I am unable to extract
hidden fields from the request.
Because of limitations on URL length, I dont want to implement it using
GET, but POST is not working. GET works fine, I
25 matches
Mail list logo
