On Jul 18, 2005, at 5:35 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
If you look in your server logs from when it was running 4.0.1, at
shutdown you probably saw an fatal error being logged. If so, I
suspect
you were taking "advantage" of SF Bug #1029918:
Nope, actually not:
[08/Jul/2005:20:00:57][30673.307
On 2005.07.18, Janine Sisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've just moved a bunch of sites around and in the process they all
> got upgraded to 4.0.10. One of them is exhibiting some odd behavior
> and I'd like to know if anyone has any idea what the problem might be.
...
> etc, etc and so fo
We've just moved a bunch of sites around and in the process they all
got upgraded to 4.0.10. One of them is exhibiting some odd behavior
and I'd like to know if anyone has any idea what the problem might be.
We use daemontools to control the sites, and when you run "svc -t
/service/whatever"
--- Jim Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fred,
>
> I was sitting on a bunch of code changes so I added
> routines to
> support this and checked it in. Routine is
> Ns_ConnReturnOpenFdEx
> which includes an offset arg and uses a pread via
> new
> Ns_ConnSendFdEx. Seems to work on a si
Hi,
I just checked in several changes to the 4.5 HEAD branch. The
ChangeLog was updated with some notes. Briefly:
- Finished up support for large content in temp-files.
- Added new routines to access uploaded files in C, e.g., Ns_ConnGetFile
- Added a new ns_cache command based on ideas fro
Fred,
I was sitting on a bunch of code changes so I added routines to
support this and checked it in. Routine is Ns_ConnReturnOpenFdEx
which includes an offset arg and uses a pread via new
Ns_ConnSendFdEx. Seems to work on a simple test I tried.
I'll send a separate note about the other
Hi,
You're right -- it's not thread safe. Two options:
1. Add the offset & length parameters and have the server use pread
as you suggest (not sure about the equivalent on win32). I suppose
this would technically not be backward compatible in case someone was
expecting the current seek
--- Jim Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You're right -- it's not thread safe. Two options:
>
> 1. Add the offset & length parameters and have the
> server use pread
> as you suggest (not sure about the equivalent on
> win32). I suppose
> this would technically not be backwar
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject:
field of your email blank.
