Re: [AOLSERVER] Question on two AOLserver tickets

2009-05-15 Thread Jack Schmidt
I guess if it's thread safe now, the ticket should be closed with a reference to aolserver 4.5. 2009/5/16 Jim Davidson > Hi, > > I'm looking at the head code and it appears it's now safe -- the connection > list is walked with a pool lock held and the request data (method, url) seem > to be copi

Re: [AOLSERVER] Question on two AOLserver tickets

2009-05-15 Thread Jade Rubick
4.0.10 J Jade Rubick Director of Development TRUiST 120 Wall Street, 4th Floor New York, NY USA jrub...@truist.com +1 503 285 4963 +1 707 671 1333 fax www.truist.com The information contained in this email/document is confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this mail/document by

Re: [AOLSERVER] Question on two AOLserver tickets

2009-05-15 Thread Jim Davidson
Hi, I'm looking at the head code and it appears it's now safe -- the connection list is walked with a pool lock held and the request data (method, url) seem to be copied with a global "reqlock" mutex held. Jade: What version of AOLserver are you using? -Jim On May 15, 2009, at 10:06 A

Re: [AOLSERVER] Question on two AOLserver tickets

2009-05-15 Thread Tom Jackson
One thing which would be nice is to put the Tcl API into a module which as to be loaded, and keep the C API available in the core. It is obviously more work, but the admin has to make a choice to load the Tcl API, which is more open to misuse. I did something like this for a few additional ns_conn

Re: [AOLSERVER] Question on two AOLserver tickets

2009-05-15 Thread Gustaf Neumann
Tom Jackson schrieb: On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 18:08 -0400, Jim Davidson wrote: Good idea. Maybe it would make sense to disable it by default with some config flag to enable? I was thinking the same, but I wasn't sure how many people actually use this command. i would even recommend