[AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Brian Fenton
Title: RE: Web design - toolkit features.   I hate it when this happens A client is wondering about AOLserver and "the mass toolkit market". He's basically asking "what's this AOLserver thing? Nobody uses that." It's a valid query and we usually respond with "it's the web server behi

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Scott S. Goodwin
tt S. Goodwine: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | u: http://scottg.netaim: scottgnet - Original Message - From: Brian Fenton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:14 AM Subject: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy   I hate it when this happens...

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread C. R. Oldham
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy   I hate it when this happens A client is wondering about AOLserver and "the mass toolkit market". He's basically asking "what's this AOLserver thing? Nobody uses that." It's a val

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Brian Fenton
Title: Message We read it as "Active Server Pages". I'm going to forward my boss' reply to the list in a moment.   -Original Message- From: C. R. Oldham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2002 14:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Daniel P. Stasinski
RE: Web design - toolkit features. > Does anyone have a stock advocacy reply they use when > clients query this kind of thing? We tell "business people" that we use aolserver, the same software developed and used by the largest internet provider in the world. I don't recall any of them ever quest

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Brian Fenton
Title: RE: Web design - toolkit features. Below is the mail my boss put together in reply to a client of our's who made the following comment about AOLserver being our chosen web server: "We do, however, have a worry though about what seems to be limited support for AOL server by the mass

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Dossy
On 2002.11.14, Brian Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would consider that the web server (Apache or AOLserver) supports the > toolkit. There are modifications available for Apache which support both > ASP and our toolkit. Unfortunately, AOLserver doesn't support ASP which is > a proprietary

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Brian Fenton
using ASPs when ADPs are identical? Or does this Chilisoft product do something more than that? Brian -Original Message- From: Dossy [mailto:dossy@;PANOPTIC.COM] Sent: 14 November 2002 16:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy On 2002.11.14, Brian Fenton &l

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread C. R. Oldham
> Given adequate financial interest, I'd be willing to > integrate ChiliSoft's ASP processor into AOLserver in some Have they kept up with all the ASP developments? I'm just curious. Maybe you can enlighten me, I have been at a loss to explain how ChiliSoft could run ASP when so much of that fun

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Dossy
On 2002.11.14, Brian Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've never seen ASP, but I thought AOLserver's ADP idea was designed to be > identical to it? I've worked with designers before who were able to open my > ADPs in Dreamweaver (and who seemed happy enough, aside from insulting my > look and fe

Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver advocacy

2002-11-14 Thread Dossy
On 2002.11.14, C. R. Oldham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Given adequate financial interest, I'd be willing to > > integrate ChiliSoft's ASP processor into AOLserver in some > > Have they kept up with all the ASP developments? I'm just curious. I honestly don't know. I just know that they exist