The following reply was made to PR general/1724; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ratman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: general/1724: endless copies of the deamon spawn, making server
not respond
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 15:45:48 -0500 (E
The following reply was made to PR general/1724; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ratman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: general/1724: endless copies of the deamon spawn, making server
not respond
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 12:29:19 -0800 (P
The following reply was made to PR general/1724; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Subject: Re: general/1724: endless copies of the deamon spawn, making
server not respond (fwd)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 12:28:45 -0800 (PST)
-- For
On 21 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
> [you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
> [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
> [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
>
>
> Synopsis:
On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 10:43:27AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> My point is that I would prefer more feedback about whether this
> would break things with the countless thousands of others out
> there running FreeBSD 2xversions. I would prefer to be conservative.
> I for one would not want to chan
=?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 10:12:38AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Since this is the only report, and it specifically mentions
> > that the OS used is FreeBSD 3, I'd prefer to be conservative at
> > this point. If FreeBSD2 is the same, I'd like that tes
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: Status Information should display server version and bu
On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 10:12:38AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Since this is the only report, and it specifically mentions
> that the OS used is FreeBSD 3, I'd prefer to be conservative at
> this point. If FreeBSD2 is the same, I'd like that tested and
> verified before changed.
It is tested and
Since this is the only report, and it specifically mentions
that the OS used is FreeBSD 3, I'd prefer to be conservative at
this point. If FreeBSD2 is the same, I'd like that tested and
verified before changed.
=?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 02:57:48PM -,
On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 02:57:48PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
> [you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
> [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
> [automatically because of the potential for mail l
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: FreeBSD Configure needs additional tuning (ctype and re
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: mod_rewrite should have the two digit year in a variabl
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: %{REMOTE_USER} returns empty string during RewriteCond/
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: REMOTE_USER defined in authenticate_basic_user and unde
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: CORBA support in Apache
State-Changed-From-To: open-cl
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: errorlog reporting
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-fee
The following reply was made to PR os-solaris/1717; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Suzy GOttesman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: os-solaris/1717: can't successfully build - do I need to change
something in configure that I'm missing?
Date
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: can't successfully build - do I need to change somethin
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: endless copies of the deamon spawn, making server not r
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: I get 'accept_mutex_on: Permission denied' in the error
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: [error] (22)Invalid argument: getsockname in error_log
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: accept: (client socket): Operation not supported on t
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: CGI SCRIPT_NAME variable includes extraneous informatio
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: MSIE returns an error: The requested header was not fou
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: DirectoryIndex index.shtml -- fails to recognise/proces
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: apache looses children
State-Changed-From-To: open-ana
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: No RLIMIT_AS => No compilation
State-Changed-From-To:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: References to /~user loop extending file name until too
The following reply was made to PR os-freebsd/1495; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Subject: Re: os-freebsd/1495: kill -1 cause lots of SIGABRT in spawned
childs due to freeing wrong memory (fwd)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb
Synopsis: kill -1 cause lots of SIGABRT in spawned childs due to freeing wrong
memory
State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed
State-Changed-By: marc
State-Changed-When: Fri Feb 20 22:09:49 PST 1998
State-Changed-Why:
Submitter reports problem solved in 1.3b5.
May the daemons of light walk with yo
On Mon, Dec 01, 1997 at 12:25:22AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Synopsis: kill -1 cause lots of SIGABRT in spawned childs due to freeing
> wrong memory
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
> State-Changed-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 30 16:25:22 PST 1997
> State-Ch
The following reply was made to PR mod_userdir/1850; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Richard Johnsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_userdir/1850: References to /~user loop extending file
name until too long.
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 199
The following reply was made to PR mod_userdir/1850; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Richard Johnsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_userdir/1850: References to /~user loop extending file name
until too long.
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998
>Number: 1853
>Category: os-linux
>Synopsis: No RLIMIT_AS => No compilation
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:apache
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Fri Feb 20 16:20:01 P
34 matches
Mail list logo
