Re: config/3520: Variable in Configuration

1999-03-10 Thread rse
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored

Re: config/3956: Apache's configure script break under new versions of grep

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR config/3956; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: config/3956: Apache's configure script break under new versions of grep Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:08:27 +0100 In article [EMAIL

Re: config/3823: enabling a module as shared does not cause it to link against the necessary extra libraries

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR config/3823; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: config/3823: enabling a module as shared does not cause it to link against the necessary extra libraries Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:57:40

Re: config/3958: configure silently ignores --enable-XXX options where XXX is unknown

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR config/3958; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: config/3958: configure silently ignores --enable-XXX options where XXX is unknown Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:16:35 +0100 In article

Re: config/4010: ./configure --enable-shared is broken

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR config/4010; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: config/4010: ./configure --enable-shared is broken Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:39:14 +0100 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:

Re: config/3983: __GNUC__ and __GNUC_MINOR__ cpp symbols tested incorrectly

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR config/3983; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: config/3983: __GNUC__ and __GNUC_MINOR__ cpp symbols tested incorrectly Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:36:30 +0100 In article [EMAIL

Re: documentation/3995: Ambiguity in INSTALL's description of --activate-module flag

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR documentation/3995; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: documentation/3995: Ambiguity in INSTALL's description of --activate-module flag Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:47:32 +0100 In

Re: general/3617: Possible buffer overflow

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR general/3617; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: general/3617: Possible buffer overflow Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:09:58 +0100 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Synopsis:

Re: general/3898: --prefix / --exec-prefix confusion

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR general/3898; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: general/3898: --prefix / --exec-prefix confusion Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:23:37 +0100 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: #

Re: general/3937: Design issues concerning shared memory.

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR general/3937; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: general/3937: Design issues concerning shared memory. Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:29:19 +0100 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:

Re: general/3942: During make install I saw Abort - core several times.

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR general/3942; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: general/3942: During make install I saw Abort - core several times. Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:33:37 +0100 In article [EMAIL

Re: mod_rewrite/3874: RewriteLock doesn't work for virtual hosts and silently fails

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR mod_rewrite/3874; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: mod_rewrite/3874: RewriteLock doesn't work for virtual hosts and silently fails Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:54:57 +0100 In article

Re: mod_status/3936: 'extendedstatus on' doesn't work

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR mod_status/3936; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: mod_status/3936: 'extendedstatus on' doesn't work Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:01:40 +0100 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:

Re: os-solaris/3977: build problem related to position independent code (PIC)

1999-03-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The following reply was made to PR os-solaris/3977; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: os-solaris/3977: build problem related to position independent code (PIC) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:37:58 +0100 In article [EMAIL

Re: os-aix/3992: Verification startup fail after successful installation.

1999-03-10 Thread coar
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored

re: general/3872: util_script.c doubles up Set-Cookie headers from r-err_headers_out

1999-03-10 Thread Dean Gaudet
The following reply was made to PR general/3872; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dean Gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jeff Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: re: general/3872: util_script.c doubles up Set-Cookie headers from r-err_headers_out Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:05:48

Re: general/3872: util_script.c doubles up Set-Cookie headers from r-err_headers_out

1999-03-10 Thread dgaudet
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored

mod_proxy/4028: Getting ap_bgets() - proxy receive - Error reading from remote server server

1999-03-10 Thread Rug Bainter
Number: 4028 Category: mod_proxy Synopsis: Getting ap_bgets() - proxy receive - Error reading from remote server server Confidential: no Severity: serious Priority: medium Responsible:apache State: open Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: apache

suexec/4030: Cannot make suexec under Solaris 2.6

1999-03-10 Thread Peter Santo
Number: 4030 Category: suexec Synopsis: Cannot make suexec under Solaris 2.6 Confidential: no Severity: non-critical Priority: medium Responsible:apache State: open Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: apache Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 10 13:30:01 PST

config/4032: Serving a business site

1999-03-10 Thread Skylor Williams
Number: 4032 Category: config Synopsis: Serving a business site Confidential: no Severity: serious Priority: medium Responsible:apache State: open Class: support Submitter-Id: apache Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 10 14:10:00 PST 1999

Re: config/4032: Serving a business site

1999-03-10 Thread marc
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored

general/4033: HTTP/0.9 requests yield invalid response

1999-03-10 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Number: 4033 Category: general Synopsis: HTTP/0.9 requests yield invalid response Confidential: no Severity: non-critical Priority: medium Responsible:apache State: open Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: apache Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 10

Re: general/4033: HTTP/0.9 requests yield invalid response

1999-03-10 Thread marc
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored

Re: suexec/4030: Cannot make suexec under Solaris 2.6

1999-03-10 Thread Peter Franken
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `suexec/4030'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: apache. Category: suexec Responsible:apache Synopsis: Cannot make suexec under Solaris 2.6

Re: suexec/4030: Cannot make suexec under Solaris 2.6

1999-03-10 Thread Peter Franken
The following reply was made to PR suexec/4030; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Franken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], apache-bugdb@apache.org Cc: Subject: Re: suexec/4030: Cannot make suexec under Solaris 2.6 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:42:13 +0100 Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED]