Re: One thing missing from STATUS for 1.3... (fwd)

2001-06-23 Thread slive
[whoops, this was meant for the list] On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Jason Lingohr wrote: > > Alrighty -- so I'm ok to go ahead and add the troff man's to the root of > the tree, as it is with 2.0? Hmmm I don't think so. I think the conclusion from Ken and me is that we shouldn't be moving around the

cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/apidoc/tools mkapidict

2001-06-23 Thread coar
coar01/06/23 06:38:23 Modified:apidoc/tools mkapidict Log: Final fix for now.. get next/prev links working Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +3 -2 httpd-docs-1.3/apidoc/tools/mkapidict Index: mkapidict =

cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/apidoc/tools mkapidict testdict.pl

2001-06-23 Thread coar
coar01/06/23 06:16:06 Modified:apidoc APIdict.pm apidoc/tools mkapidict testdict.pl Log: More fixes.. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +6 -3 httpd-docs-1.3/apidoc/APIdict.pm Index: APIdict.pm =

Re: One thing missing from STATUS for 1.3...

2001-06-23 Thread Jason Lingohr
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 08:53:50AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually, the HTML versions are already there, which is why I assumed that > this STATUS item referred to the troff versions. Perhaps we have hit the > source of the original confusion here. > > I am in full agreement with the