On Sat, 19 May 2001, Chris Pepper wrote:
> At 4:35 PM -0400 2001/05/19, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >James Sutherland wrote:
> >>
> >> The latter one would be more consistent with other lists, I think?
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the preferred syntax these days,
> >rather than [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > - Under what circumstances is mod_cgid used and when is mod_cgi
> > > used?
> >
> > Mod_cgid should be used whenever you are using a threaded MPM on Unix.
> > The reason for the module, is that Unix platfor
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Attached is just a quick scratch at some docs for mod_cgid.
> (Also available at
> http://garibaldi.commerce.ubc.ca:8080/ap20/manual/mod/mod_cgid.html )
I haven't had a chance to review the docs, but here are the answers to
your questions.
> - Under what
+1. Before we do this, can we list which FAQ's will remain, and which
will be removed?
Ryan
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> Proposal: Remove essentially all the questions/answers from the 2.0 FAQ.
> Leave only perhaps half a dozen of the most general questions. Add a
> reference
> I just did a tiny bit of work adding some filter docs. Perhaps someone
> who has actually tried some of this stuff can look it over.
>
> In particular, a few things I don't know:
>
> 1. What is the "SetFilter" directive in mod_mime?
It is bogus, I'll remove it ASAP.
> 2. Are there any other
> The apache_pb.gif was missing from docs/docroot, it's there now.
> Update your tree to grab it (no commit, it was a cp.)
>
> Thought, if any docco folk want to commit an improved '2.0'
> graphic, that would be very cool. I have some real docco work
> I need to do before we roll tonight.
I wou
Noo. wait Well, alright. ++1. :-)
Ryan
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Any objections...
>
> I'm blasting mod_dll.c, the mod_dll.html docs, and any reference to
> mod_dll throughout the docs, at noon CST Wednesday. This module was
> depreciated before
Applied. Thanks. :-)
Ryan
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> Here is my suggestion for a change to incorporate the 2.0 docs in the
> website. Along with that small change, I also made two other fixes in the
> index.html page:
>
> 1. Added a missing period in the Apache 2
I'll try to apply these tonight.
Ryan
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> Here is my suggestion for a change to incorporate the 2.0 docs in the
> website. Along with that small change, I also made two other fixes in the
> index.html page:
>
> 1. Added a missing period in th
> 1. Installation docs: I can't even compile the most recent alpha on any of
> my systems, so I am at a loss on how to even start this.
To compile the most recent alpha, just remove the test target from all
Makefiles. This is an issue that we are aware of. :-( The installation
docs should be v
> I'm just looking over mod_access.html to see if it can be improved,
> and I'm wondering, what is the point of the Order directive anyway? Why
> doesn't Apache just evaluate each "allow" or "deny" in the order in which
> they appear in the config file?
>
> The Order directive seems to be a cons
Okay, I just backed that out. I'll a bit closer and see if there is
anything I can do. If not, I'll leave this for somebody else.
Ryan
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Joshua,
> >
> > I think I just fixed this, can you test if
Joshua,
I think I just fixed this, can you test if for me?
Ryan
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Now that we have commit access to httpd-docs-2.0 back, someone
> needs to get commit log mails flowing back into this list again.
>
> It looks like all that is needed is a modification of
> Now that we have commit access to httpd-docs-2.0 back, someone
> needs to get commit log mails flowing back into this list again.
>
> It looks like all that is needed is a modification of
> CVSROOT/log_accum.pl along the line of what was done
> here:
> my(%mapping) = ('apache-2.0/src/include'
> > Okay, Greg did a wonderful job of trackind down the problem, and I have
> > implemented his solution. Could somebody PLEASE check out a copy of
> > httpd-2.0-docs, and try to commit to it? If it doesn't work, please let
> > me know ASAP so I can undue the changes.
> >
>
> Sorry. Thanks for
> > Nope. I can commit fine to httpd-docs-1.3, but httpd-docs-2.0 is still
> > no-go as far as I know.
> >
> > Ryan, Roy, Ken, anyone? We could use some help here.
>
> I would love to help, but I really don't know how to.
Okay, Greg did a wonderful job of trackind down the problem, and I
> above, "httpd-2.0/docs" is passed in.
>
> The avail file should read:
>
> avail|...|httpd-docs-1.3,httpd-2.0/docs
>
>
> The people that can make this change to avail are:
>
> brian,coar,dirkx,duncan,jon,pier,craigmcc,manoj,fielding,rbb
>
> I
>
> Nope. I can commit fine to httpd-docs-1.3, but httpd-docs-2.0 is still
> no-go as far as I know.
>
> Ryan, Roy, Ken, anyone? We could use some help here.
I would love to help, but I really don't know how to.
Sorry,
Ryan
___
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Chris Pepper wrote:
> Is this feature available in 2.0 too, or just 1.3.15? (I'm
> trying to bring my 1.3 changes over to 2.0, and noticed that it's
> mentioned in but not
> 2.0:
Yes it is in 2.0 as well.
Ryan
___
rbb 00/12/01 15:26:04
Modified:src/include ap_listen.h
Log:
Remove an unnecessary header file.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +0 -1 apache-2.0/src/include/ap_listen.h
Index: ap_listen.h
rbb 00/11/30 08:29:05
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_log_config.html
Log:
Document mod_log_config %{FOOBAR}C option
Submitted by: Sander van Zoest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.41 +2 -0 httpd-docs-2.0/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_log_confi
rbb 00/11/27 19:01:10
Modified:src/include http_connection.h
Log:
Fix some incorrect docs
Submitted by: Jon Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +2 -2 apache-2.0/src/include/http_connection.h
Index: http_connec
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Horton, Louise M. wrote:
> Please take me off your list. This is rediculous.
> Louise
You can remove yourself by sending an empty e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ryan
___
Ryan Bloom
If you are VERY careful, it should be safe to just delete the tags from
the ,v file. Please, keep a backup copy in your directory before you edit
the file. And, let me know when you are done. I want to roll an alpha in
about 15 minutes.
Ryan
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On W
This should be fixed now. Please make sure this is still up to date.
Ryan
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Joshua Slive wrote:
> OK, I messed up when I made the platform directory:
>
> I copied win_compiling.html,v onto BOTH
> platform/win_compiling.html,v AND platform/windows.html,v.
> (In other words,
NO! :-) We have to actually restore the ,v file in CVS. I'm on this
now.
Ryan
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Back out your update by doing a cvs update to the old content.
>
> While HEAD <> last and last <> prior will be very messy diffs,
> the HEAD <> prior will be ide
> OK, I messed up when I made the platform directory:
>
> I copied win_compiling.html,v onto BOTH
> platform/win_compiling.html,v AND platform/windows.html,v.
> (In other words, I trashed windows.html.)
>
> Now, I can easily get the content back, but I am not sure
> how to get the CVS history bac
rbb 00/11/21 16:40:21
Modified:src/main http_protocol.c
src/include http_core.h
Log:
Next pass at the content-length filter. Not perfect quite yet, but
getting closer
Submitted by: Greg Stein
Revision ChangesPath
1.252 +9 -4 apache-2.0
rbb 00/11/21 08:53:34
Modified:src/include httpd.h
Log:
We are working on a9 now.
Revision ChangesPath
1.118 +1 -1 apache-2.0/src/include/httpd.h
Index: httpd.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvs
rbb 00/11/20 12:10:51
Modified:src/include httpd.h
Log:
Get the version number bumped to 2.0a8
Revision ChangesPath
1.117 +1 -1 apache-2.0/src/include/httpd.h
Index: httpd.h
===
RCS
rbb 00/11/19 13:52:50
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mpm_common.html
Log:
Add some docs to the common MPM directives.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +38 -14httpd-docs-2.0/htdocs/manual/mod/mpm_common.html
Index: mpm_common.html
> I don't have strong feelings about it, but I do think that there will be
> people who want to answer the question "What directives are provided by
> MPM XXX?" If the MPM pages are not comprehensive, then they will need to
> go through the MPM pages, plus page through the entire mpm_common.
>
>
Would anybody mind if we re-organized the MPM docs slightly?
What I am thinking, is that currently we have an html page for each
individual MPM, and then a page for the common directives. On the module
index pages we have a link for each individual MPM. Inside each MPM page,
we link to each dire
rbb 00/11/19 12:35:04
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod index-bytype.html
Log:
Add the MPM docs to the index-bytype front page.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +15 -1 httpd-docs-2.0/htdocs/manual/mod/index-bytype.html
Index: index-bytype.html
On 19 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> slive 00/11/19 11:56:44
>
> Modified:htdocs/manual/mod dexter.html directives.html index.html
> mod_usertrack.html mpm_common.html
> Added: htdocs/manual/mod perchild.html
> Log:
> Add the perchild MPM docs
> > > 4. I believe that there are going to be many different MPMs using the
> > > same directive names. Unless we can guarantee that all the MPMs will use
> > > the directive in EXACTLY the same way, we will still need to document them
> > > separately and make separate entires in directives.html
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Tony Finch wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> 1. mpmt_pthread is a really crappy name for a module.
> >
> >Agreed. It is even worse because it doesn't rely on pthreads
> >anymore. Please, if anybody can come up with a better name, we need it.
>
> I think the importa
> 1. mpmt_pthread is a really crappy name for a module.
Agreed. It is even worse because it doesn't rely on pthreads
anymore. Please, if anybody can come up with a better name, we need it.
> 2. Is this format appropriate? It is modeled as closely as possible on
> the new format for other modu
> - MPM documentation
>- each MPM needs to have a documentation file in manual/mod/
> (or perhaps manual/mod/mpm)
> which lists the directives it provides, and some details
> about its operation.
I can get a basic definition of each MPM's operation to whoever wants
it. I have
rbb 00/11/12 18:57:25
Modified:src/lib/apr/include apr.hw
Log:
Make Win32 compile again by defining APR_INADDR_NONE in apr.hw.
Submitted by: Branko Èibej" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.35 +5 -0 apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/include/apr.hw
rbb 00/11/10 16:12:40
Modified:src/lib/apr/include apr_errno.h
Log:
Fix the rest of the APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS definitions.
Submitted by: Karl Fogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.43 +2 -2 apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/include/apr_errno.h
rbb 00/11/10 16:08:03
Modified:src/lib/apr/include apr_errno.h
Log:
Add a missing variable is APR_IS_SUCCESS macro
Submitted by: Karl Fogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +1 -1 apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/include/apr_errno.h
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Ben Laurie wrote:
> BTW, wtf is this going to httpd-docs-2.0-cvs???
Because the API docs are a part of the header files, whenever a header is
changed the doc group needs to be notified.
Ryan
___
Rya
rbb 00/11/04 22:09:10
Modified:src/lib/apr/include apr_file_io.h
Log:
Fix a bit of docs with the new pipe timeout code.
Submitted by: Chris Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.70 +2 -3 apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/include/apr_file_io.h
rbb 00/11/04 08:34:51
Modified:src CHANGES
src/ap ap_buckets_pipe.c
src/lib/apr/file_io/unix pipe.c
src/lib/apr/include apr_file_io.h
Log:
Make non-blocking reads from pipes work through the bucket interface.
Revision
rbb 00/10/30 16:47:25
Modified:src/modules/standard mod_suexec.c mod_userdir.c
src/os/unix Makefile.in unixd.c unixd.h
Removed: src/os/unix suexec.c suexec.h
Log:
Make mod_cgi and mod_include work when compiled as DSO's again. This is
accomplish
rbb 00/10/24 09:11:24
Modified:src/os/unix suexec.c suexec.h
Log:
Remove some warnings added with suexec
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +3 -3 apache-2.0/src/os/unix/suexec.c
Index: suexec.c
rbb 00/10/16 20:18:47
Modified:src/include ap_buckets.h
Log:
Capitalize a part of a macro that was accidentally committed in lowercase
Revision ChangesPath
1.43 +1 -1 apache-2.0/src/include/ap_buckets.h
Index: ap_buckets.h
rbb 00/10/16 07:08:24
Modified:src CHANGES
src/ap ap_buckets.c
src/include ap_buckets.h
Log:
Make ap_bucket_(read|destroy|split|setaside) into macros. Also
makes ap_bucket_destroy a return void, which is okay because it
used to always
rbb 00/10/10 15:12:21
Modified:src/include ap_buckets.h
Log:
Remove the BRIGADE_UNSPLICE macro. This macro is unweildy, and the task
is solved better with the ap_brigade_split function
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +0 -2 apache-2.0/src/include/ap_buckets.h
rbb 00/10/09 07:15:33
Modified:src/include httpd.h
Log:
Update some docs httpd.h
Revision ChangesPath
1.96 +29 -11apache-2.0/src/include/httpd.h
Index: httpd.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvs
rbb 00/10/09 07:07:55
Modified:src/lib/apr/include apr_dso.h apr_general.h apr_getopt.h
Log:
Add some docs to APR.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +1 -1 apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/include/apr_dso.h
Index: apr_dso.h
rbb 00/10/08 17:34:41
Modified:src CHANGES
Log:
Update the CHANGES file for 2.0a8
Revision ChangesPath
1.261 +2 -0 apache-2.0/src/CHANGES
Index: CHANGES
===
RCS file: /home/cvs
rbb 00/10/01 17:43:32
Modified:src/include ap_buckets.h
Log:
Fix some docs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +1 -1 apache-2.0/src/include/ap_buckets.h
Index: ap_buckets.h
===
RCS file: /home
rbb 00/09/12 21:35:23
Modified:src/lib/apr/include apr_dso.h
Log:
Fix some docs
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +3 -3 apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/include/apr_dso.h
Index: apr_dso.h
===
RCS file
rbb 00/09/12 18:59:35
Modified:src/include ap_buckets.h
Log:
Wrap the UNSPLICE macro for use with bucket brigades. This allows buckets
to be removed from a brigade
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +2 -1 apache-2.0/src/include/ap_buckets.h
Index
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Thornton, Randy wrote:
> How do I unsubscribe to this list?
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ryan
___
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94
> > These are ScanDoc blocks. They way ScanDoc works is that there is a
> > template perl script, that is filled out to actually generate the HTML
> > files. It would be really cool if we could make the template file a bit
> > cleaner or if it was modified to use DocBook instead of HTML.
> >
>
I wanted to give a potential project to anybody on this list looking for
something to help with. :-) I would do this myself, but I have very
poor HTML skills, and my documentation skills aren't great either. :-)
Earlier this year, I spent a long time documenting the entire 2.0
API. This has b
rbb 00/08/24 08:04:34
Modified:src/ap Makefile.in
src/include ap_buckets.h
Log:
Fix the building of the pipe buckets. Somehow between running my last test
compile and my commit, I blew away the definition of the pipe bucket type.
Revision Changes
On 24 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rbb 00/08/23 21:17:46
>
> Modified:src/ap Makefile.in
>src/include ap_buckets.h
> Added: src/ap ap_buckets_pipe.c
> Log:
> This is a first pass at a pipe bucket type. This compiles, b
rbb 00/08/23 21:17:46
Modified:src/ap Makefile.in
src/include ap_buckets.h
Added: src/ap ap_buckets_pipe.c
Log:
This is a first pass at a pipe bucket type. This compiles, but it is
untested.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +1 -1
rbb 00/07/29 07:30:29
Added: htdocs/manual/developer documenting
Log:
Add a small doc on how to document the APIs for use with ScanDoc.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 httpd-docs-2.0/htdocs/manual/developer/documenting
Index: documenting
rbb 00/07/27 10:55:19
Added: htdocs/manual new_features_2_0.html
Log:
Add the new_features_2_0.html file. This is very incomplete. We can and
should flush it out later.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/new_features_2_0.html
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Okey, here's another attempt, now that I have some time to write
> it up.
+1
> Concerns and other items:
When the new module is created I would like to see all current apache-cvs
subscribers added to the new list. I don't expect so much traf
65 matches
Mail list logo
