Re: httpd-docs-1.3 and xml and porting changes

2001-10-02 Thread Rich Bowen
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > > > > 1. Apply tidy with exactly the same options to > > httpd-docs-1.3 and hope that the formating is close > > enough to make things work. > > +1 OK. I wondered about this at the time, and forgot to mention it. I was not

Re: httpd-docs-1.3 and xml and porting changes

2001-10-01 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Joshua Slive wrote: > > 1. Apply tidy with exactly the same options to > httpd-docs-1.3 and hope that the formating is close > enough to make things work. +1 > 2. Abandon the 1.3 docs except for very important changes. Not an option, I don't think. 1.3 is going to be the more widely deployed v

httpd-docs-1.3 and xml and porting changes

2001-10-01 Thread Joshua Slive
I should have brought this up before, but I forgot about the issue. We now have a serious problem bringing forward or backward changes in the docs. Because of the xhtml changes in the 2.0 docs, there is no longer any way to get reasonable diffs between 1.3 and 2.0. For example, if we commit cha