On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > Well, I do -- until there is a replacement. In fact,
> > I will veto its removal until there is something as
> > good or better for 3P module writers to use as a
> > template.
>
> Sorry, I was under the impression that mod_TEMPLATE was in httpd-docs-1.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> When it comes to templates, there is also the
> htdocs/manual/man-template.html file. Whatever we
> end up using, the other should go away, or at
> least be replaced with a pointer to the new 'current'
> template.
Ah. Missed that one. I'll tak
x.html, index_bytype.html, and directives.html)
automatically by scanning the directories for mod_*.html files
and then scanning those.. calling it something *other* than
'mod_TEMPLATE.html' or possibly putting it in the parent directory
would avoid its accidental inclus
> -Original Message-
> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > man-template.html is obsolete. I removed it from
> > httpd-2.0/docs/manual/ quite some time ago but I've
> > generally not removed anything from 1.3.
> > I have no objection to re
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> man-template.html is obsolete. I removed it from
> httpd-2.0/docs/manual/ quite some time ago but I've
> generally not removed anything from 1.3.
> I have no objection to removing it.
Well, I do -- until there is a replacement. In fact,
I will veto its removal until ther
> -Original Message-
> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> When it comes to templates, there is also the
> htdocs/manual/man-template.html file. Whatever we
> end up using, the other should go away, or at
> least be replaced with a pointer to the new 'current'
> tem
When it comes to templates, there is also the
htdocs/manual/man-template.html file. Whatever we
end up using, the other should go away, or at
least be replaced with a pointer to the new 'current'
template.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, develope
From: "David A. Hasan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:43 PM
> >On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > > It would be nice to downcase all the tags, but I'm too lazy to do it
> >> myself, so I don't expect you to do it.
> >
> >Likewise with this. Is this merely "it
>On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > It would be nice to downcase all the tags, but I'm too lazy to do it
>> myself, so I don't expect you to do it.
>
>Likewise with this. Is this merely "it would be nice" or is the The
>Way That Things Should Be? It's a simple thing to do, but I want to
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
> The HTML docs used to be postprocessed into postscript and made available
> as one big file so people didn't have to use a "web browser" to read them.
> The scripts that did it are probably around somewhere... the %plaintext
> stuff was used as part of som
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > I would drop the
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
> I would drop the
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I have not committed this. Just submitting it for peer review and
> > approval/suggestions.
>
> Looks good.
>
> I would drop the
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I have not committed this. Just submitting it for peer review and
> approval/suggestions.
Looks good.
I would drop the
I have not committed this. Just submitting it for peer review and
approval/suggestions.
I called it mod_TEMPLATE.html rather than mod_template.html in case we
have a mod_template at some point, as an implementation of one of
the plethora of template-based web content generation tools. Of
course
15 matches
Mail list logo
