Re: reorg of core.html

2000-10-09 Thread Joshua Slive
alHost docs work at the moment. They discuss all the directives, but they do not themselves contain the directive definitions. If such documents existed, then the reorg of core.html would probably not be necessary. I really consider this a temporary measure to provide some sort of help for p

Re: reorg of core.html

2000-10-09 Thread Chris Pepper
At 8:59 AM -0700 2000/10/09, Joshua Slive wrote: On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Chris Pepper wrote: I like the new organization, but think the alpha listing is also worthwhile. Why? What does it offer that directives.html does not? (ie. In what circumstances would someone have to spend a non-trivial

Re: reorg of core.html

2000-10-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Chris Pepper wrote: > I like the new organization, but think the alpha listing is > also worthwhile. Why? What does it offer that directives.html does not? (ie. In what circumstances would someone have to spend a non-trivial amount of extra time searching for someth

Re: reorg of core.html

2000-10-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Raymond S Brand wrote: > Its nice but please keep the alphabetical index also. > Raymond, don't take this the wrong way, but every contribution that I have seen you make to this list so far has been a conservative one. Several times when I have proposed to remove something

Re: reorg of core.html

2000-10-09 Thread Chris Pepper
At 11:31 AM -0400 2000/10/09, Raymond S Brand wrote: Its nice but please keep the alphabetical index also. Raymond S Brand Joshua Slive wrote: > Attached is a reorganization of the directives section in core.html. It sorts directives first by purpose, and then alphabetically. This does not

Re: reorg of core.html

2000-10-09 Thread Raymond S Brand
Its nice but please keep the alphabetical index also. Raymond S Brand Joshua Slive wrote: > > I realize I'm going to get the reputation of someone who just likes to > sort everything, but > > Attached is a reorganization of the directives section in core.html. It > sorts directive

Re: reorg of core.html

2000-10-06 Thread Rich Bowen
Joshua Slive wrote: > > I realize I'm going to get the reputation of someone who just likes to > sort everything, but > > Attached is a reorganization of the directives section in core.html. It > sorts directives first by purpose, and then alphabetically. This does not > match the format of

reorg of core.html

2000-10-06 Thread Joshua Slive
I realize I'm going to get the reputation of someone who just likes to sort everything, but Attached is a reorganization of the directives section in core.html. It sorts directives first by purpose, and then alphabetically. This does not match the format of the other modules docs, but core.ht