Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-21 Thread Rich Bowen
On 09/20/2016 05:29 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Justin Mclean > wrote: >> >> Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume >> assume I don’t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any >> suggestions on how many time

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-20 Thread Bob Paulin
Well played. Not a bug but a feature ;). - Bob On 9/20/2016 12:39 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 09/20/2016 07:37 PM, Bob Paulin wrote: Hi I noticed that if I don't get through the reviews for the day, leave and come back that the % reviewed goes back to 0%. Is that expected? Yes, it's all a

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-20 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 09/20/2016 07:37 PM, Bob Paulin wrote: > Hi I noticed that if I don't get through the reviews for the day, leave > and come back that the % reviewed goes back to 0%. Is that expected? > Yes, it's all a mental ruse of sort, to get you to review as many talks as possible :) we are evl. Wit

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-20 Thread Bob Paulin
Hi I noticed that if I don't get through the reviews for the day, leave and come back that the % reviewed goes back to 0%. Is that expected? - Bob On 9/20/2016 7:25 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: Me neither. Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-20 Thread Pierre Smits
Me neither. Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Sharan Foga wrote: > Hi Justin > > I asked Rich the review date question the other day and he said a 23rd >

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-20 Thread Sharan Foga
Hi Justin I asked Rich the review date question the other day and he said a 23rd September. (BTW I've been working my way through a few combinations but won't get anywhere near 30,000!) Thanks Sharan On 20/09/16 11:26, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-20 Thread Pierre Smits
Hi Justin, I expect that there will be lead time needed before that to assess the evaluations done. Are you going to attend? Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Tue, Sep 2

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-20 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi, On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume > assume I don’t have to go through all the 30,000+ combinations? Any > suggestions on how many time we should go through the review process. > Web site says tha

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy we have there, > however that only works for the conference administrators as set by > Rich, so it'll show nothing or 0 for you :) Everything is okay :) Good to hear. What's the date we need to review everything by? I assume assume I don’t

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-18 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 09/18/2016 03:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I just when through a large number of comparisons for ApacheCon and at the > end it shows a list of 174 talks but they all have 0 votes is this > expected/correct? > > Thanks, > Justin > Yeah, you (accidentally) clicked on a debug thingy w

Re: ApacheCon session reviewers needed

2016-09-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I just when through a large number of comparisons for ApacheCon and at the end it shows a list of 174 talks but they all have 0 votes is this expected/correct? Thanks, Justin