I also have potential sponsors who are not sponsoring because the base
price is too high. We are trying to offer anyone who sponsors with a note
of CloudStack or CCC (with any type of sponsorship) equal visibility in the
CCC track. The sponsor ends up just sponsoring ApacheCon, but we are going
t
Unfortunately, I have some additional info I think could be interesting for
others.
As far as I understood it, it was planned that the sub-events allow more
fine-grained sponsoring.
I already had two companies that were generally willing to sponsor the FlexJS
summit.
Unfortunately, the LF do
On Jan 30, 2017 19:08, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
Hi!
I don't think this question has come up on this thread yet, so here it is:
what are our thinking about sponsorship? Right now we have two separate
sponsorship buckets: Bigdata and Core. Do we plan to keep it that way?
Suppose there's somebody
> of projects all in generally the same technology space, to 300 projects
> > across all areas of technology, has put a great strain on our ability to
> > produce a conference that is "about Apache", and have people actually
> > attend to it.
> >
> > I&#
that is "about Apache", and have people actually
> attend to it.
>
> I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
> already been moving towards for many years, and which we want to make
> the final leap to in 2018 - ApacheCon as a convention of A
Hey Rich,
I had a chance to read through your doc last night. I fully support what
you are trying to do here. I talked to Angela at ApacheCon Seville, to try
to setup something like this for CloudStack in Miami. I didn't realize
that the big picture for ApacheCon was going in this direction as w
ts
> across all areas of technology, has put a great strain on our ability to
> produce a conference that is "about Apache", and have people actually
> attend to it.
>
> I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
> already been moving towa
on our ability to
> produce a conference that is "about Apache", and have people actually
> attend to it.
>
> I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
> already been moving towards for many years, and which we want to make
> the fina
On Jan 27, 2017 17:07, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Excellent stuff!
>
> Will there be any coordination between CFPs? We do have a few general
> talks that are still valuable, either from great speakers on topics that
> are always popular or
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Excellent stuff!
>
> Will there be any coordination between CFPs? We do have a few general
> talks that are still valuable, either from great speakers on topics that
> are always popular or because they help our communities. But I imagine
>
ld be. Moving from a handful
>> of projects all in generally the same technology space, to 300 projects
>> across all areas of technology, has put a great strain on our ability to
>> produce a conference that is "about Apache", and have people actually
>> attend to
put a great strain on our ability to
> produce a conference that is "about Apache", and have people actually
> attend to it.
>
> I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
> already been moving towards for many years, and which we want to make
&g
On 01/27/2017 04:18 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> That much said, I would have loved to see tracks which are less project
> specific, and more feature specific. Like, how to use H2 in the Apache
> Ecosystem. But, I’m not sure how the response was for that? If it seemed
> useful, would there be ro
tend to it.
>
> I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
> already been moving towards for many years, and which we want to make
> the final leap to in 2018 - ApacheCon as a convention of Apache project
> mini-conferences.
>
> In Miami this ye
Apache", and have people actually
> attend to it.
>
> I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
> already been moving towards for many years, and which we want to make
> the final leap to in 2018 - ApacheCon as a convention of Apache proj
On 01/27/2017 02:20 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Roger, I will talk to the PMC chairs. Is there a preference from ACNA /
> LinuxFoundation? I’m fairly certain we would prefer Mon-Tue, or even Tue-Wed
> if LF is ok with that.
>
>> Events that are outside of the main event (chronologically) will h
pace, to 300 projects
>>> across all areas of technology, has put a great strain on our ability to
>>> produce a conference that is "about Apache", and have people actually
>>> attend to it.
>>>
>>> I'd like to offer my vision for
roduce a conference that is "about Apache", and have people actually
>> attend to it.
>>
>> I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
>> already been moving towards for many years, and which we want to make
>> the final
tend to it.
>
> I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
> already been moving towards for many years, and which we want to make
> the final leap to in 2018 - ApacheCon as a convention of Apache project
> mini-conferences.
>
> In Miami this ye
same technology space, to 300 projects
across all areas of technology, has put a great strain on our ability to
produce a conference that is "about Apache", and have people actually
attend to it.
I'd like to offer my vision for ApacheCon.next - something that we've
already been movi
20 matches
Mail list logo
