I also have potential sponsors who are not sponsoring because the base
price is too high. We are trying to offer anyone who sponsors with a note
of CloudStack or CCC (with any type of sponsorship) equal visibility in the
CCC track. The sponsor ends up just sponsoring ApacheCon, but we are going
t
Unfortunately, I have some additional info I think could be interesting for
others.
As far as I understood it, it was planned that the sub-events allow more
fine-grained sponsoring.
I already had two companies that were generally willing to sponsor the FlexJS
summit.
Unfortunately, the LF do
On Jan 30, 2017 19:08, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
Hi!
I don't think this question has come up on this thread yet, so here it is:
what are our thinking about sponsorship? Right now we have two separate
sponsorship buckets: Bigdata and Core. Do we plan to keep it that way?
Suppose there's somebody
I am bringing my sponsors for CCC on as core sponsors and I am being
notified by the LF when a sponsor specifies that they are sponsoring CCC.
These sponsors are not treated any differently by apachecon, but I am
giving them extra visibility in our community and will be giving them
special visibili
Hi!
I don't think this question has come up on this thread yet, so here it is:
what are our thinking about sponsorship? Right now we have two separate
sponsorship buckets: Bigdata and Core. Do we plan to keep it that way?
Suppose there's somebody interested in sponsoring Apache XXX (where
XXX !=
Hey Rich,
I had a chance to read through your doc last night. I fully support what
you are trying to do here. I talked to Angela at ApacheCon Seville, to try
to setup something like this for CloudStack in Miami. I didn't realize
that the big picture for ApacheCon was going in this direction as w
On Jan 28, 2017 05:16, "Dennis Kieselhorst" wrote:
> As you might imagine, I've spent a LOT of time over the last 15 years
> thinking about what ApacheCon is, and should be. Moving from a handful
> of projects all in generally the same technology space, to 300 projects
> across all areas of tech
> As you might imagine, I've spent a LOT of time over the last 15 years
> thinking about what ApacheCon is, and should be. Moving from a handful
> of projects all in generally the same technology space, to 300 projects
> across all areas of technology, has put a great strain on our ability to
> pr
On Jan 27, 2017 17:07, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Excellent stuff!
>
> Will there be any coordination between CFPs? We do have a few general
> talks that are still valuable, either from great speakers on topics that
> are always popular or
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Excellent stuff!
>
> Will there be any coordination between CFPs? We do have a few general
> talks that are still valuable, either from great speakers on topics that
> are always popular or because they help our communities. But I imagine
>
On 01/27/2017 04:40 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Excellent stuff!
>
> Will there be any coordination between CFPs? We do have a few general
> talks that are still valuable, either from great speakers on topics that
> are always popular or because they help our communities. But I imagine
> a few
Excellent stuff!
Will there be any coordination between CFPs? We do have a few general
talks that are still valuable, either from great speakers on topics that
are always popular or because they help our communities. But I imagine
a few submissions will end up going to only the LF's main CFP, no
On 01/27/2017 04:18 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> That much said, I would have loved to see tracks which are less project
> specific, and more feature specific. Like, how to use H2 in the Apache
> Ecosystem. But, I’m not sure how the response was for that? If it seemed
> useful, would there be ro
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 6:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> (With apologies to people who have already seen this discussion
> elsewhere. I figured more eyes on it was better.)
>
> As you might imagine, I've spent a LOT of time over the last 15 years
> thinking about what ApacheCon is, and should be. M
+1 I really like this new direction!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> (With apologies to people who have already seen this discussion
> elsewhere. I figured more eyes on it was better.)
>
> As you might imagine, I've spent a LOT of time over the last 15 years
>
On 01/27/2017 02:20 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Roger, I will talk to the PMC chairs. Is there a preference from ACNA /
> LinuxFoundation? I’m fairly certain we would prefer Mon-Tue, or even Tue-Wed
> if LF is ok with that.
>
>> Events that are outside of the main event (chronologically) will h
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/27/2017 01:58 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2017, at 6:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>
>>> (With apologies to people who have already seen this discussion
>>> elsewhere. I figured more eyes on it was better.)
>>>
>>>
On 01/27/2017 01:58 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Jan 27, 2017, at 6:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>> (With apologies to people who have already seen this discussion
>> elsewhere. I figured more eyes on it was better.)
>>
>> As you might imagine, I've spent a LOT of time over the last 15 years
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 6:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> (With apologies to people who have already seen this discussion
> elsewhere. I figured more eyes on it was better.)
>
> As you might imagine, I've spent a LOT of time over the last 15 years
> thinking about what ApacheCon is, and should be. M
19 matches
Mail list logo
