Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Done S On Aug 14, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > me (reto@a.o) too please. > -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com/ Conferences and technical event management at http://

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

me (reto@a.o) too please. Cheers, Reto On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Hi there, > > andy AT apache.org for Linked Data. > > Thanks > Andy > > > On 11/08/12 10:31, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Hi, >> Same here olamy AT apache DOT org for Apache Daily track. >

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Looks like Nick added you already. S On Aug 13, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Hi there, > > andy AT apache.org for Linked Data. > > Thanks > Andy > > On 11/08/12 10:31, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> Hi, >> Same here olamy AT apache DOT org for Apache Daily track. >> Thanks >>

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi there, andy AT apache.org for Linked Data. Thanks Andy On 11/08/12 10:31, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, Same here olamy AT apache DOT org for Apache Daily track. Thanks -- Olivier 2012/8/10 Steve Holden : Invited. S On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi,

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

August 10, 2012 1:56 PM > Subject: Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...) > > Hi, > > As I would like to review the Web Infrastructure track could I get access to > the > talks? I will also help for the ApachEE track is needed. > > Cheers > > Jean-Frederic >

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Invited. S On Aug 11, 2012, at 2:31 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > Same here olamy AT apache DOT org for Apache Daily track. > Thanks > -- > Olivier > > 2012/8/10 Steve Holden : >> Invited. >> >> S >> >> On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> As I would

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi, Same here olamy AT apache DOT org for Apache Daily track. Thanks -- Olivier 2012/8/10 Steve Holden : > Invited. > > S > > On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As I would like to review the Web Infrastructure track could I get access to >> the talks? I will al

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Invited. S On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > As I would like to review the Web Infrastructure track could I get access to > the talks? I will also help for the ApachEE track is needed. > > Cheers > > Jean-Frederic -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi, As I would like to review the Web Infrastructure track could I get access to the talks? I will also help for the ApachEE track is needed. Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Yes. The review system is designed to prohibit submitters from voting on or seeing the reviewers' comments about their talks - they just get the same access to their own talks as any other speaker. This is why registering with two identities would open up the potential for "gaming" the system.

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi Ted, Aye I can see it so presumably everyone else can as well. Best Lewis On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > In http://www.apachecon.eu/reviews/section/talks/, I don't see my > proposal (Multiple > WAL support in HBase ). > > I assume other

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

In http://www.apachecon.eu/reviews/section/talks/, I don't see my proposal (Multiple WAL support in HBase ). I assume other reviewers can see it. Cheers On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Thanks for clarifying twice, Steve. > > > On Thu, Aug

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Thanks for clarifying twice, Steve. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Ted: > > On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Currently the Vote is a required field on review page. > > Since there're a few talks submitted, can this field be made optional ? > > > > That way

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Ted: On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Currently the Vote is a required field on review page. > Since there're a few talks submitted, can this field be made optional ? > > That way I would be able to put down comments so that the speaker can > improve his / her talk. > I only just

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

I believe the usual convention is to vote 0 as you make these comments - you can go back later and change your vote. Some people, however, prefer to record a negative vote at that time and then correct it if feedback and changes from the author merit it. regards Steve On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:14

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Invited. S On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:18 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > Steve, I still cannot access the proposals. I'm the track chair for the > modular java applications. Could you please give me access again. > > > On Aug 9, 2012, at 3:05 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > >> Invited. >> >> S >> >> On

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Steve, I still cannot access the proposals. I'm the track chair for the modular java applications. Could you please give me access again. On Aug 9, 2012, at 3:05 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Invited. > > S > > On Aug 8, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> Hi Steve. >> >> I've added i...@

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Invited. S On Aug 8, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hi Steve. > > I've added i...@apache.org. > > regards > Ian -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com/ Conferences and technica

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi Steve. I've added i...@apache.org. regards Ian On Aug 9, 2012, at 2:01 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Tia: > > You'll need to create an account under that email address before we can add > you to the reviewer team, please. > > regards > Steve > > On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Invited. S On Aug 8, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hi Steve... > > Would you please grant me access too, account: mn...@apache.org > > Thanks in advance -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the w

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi Steve... Would you please grant me access too, account: mn...@apache.org Thanks in advance On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Steve Holden wrote: > Invitation issued. > > S > > On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Should be struberg at yahoo.de > > > > txs and

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Invitation issued. S On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > Should be struberg at yahoo.de > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com/

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Currently the Vote is a required field on review page. Since there're a few talks submitted, can this field be made optional ? That way I would be able to put down comments so that the speaker can improve his / her talk. Cheers On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Ted: > > I'

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi! Should be struberg at yahoo.de txs and LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Steve Holden > To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 6:02 PM > Subject: Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...) > > Please

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Ted: I've heard back about this enhancement request, and it's on the list. There should be a track filter by the beginning of next week. regards Steve On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Thanks, Steve. > > How do I get access to the submissions for NoSQL track ? > > On Wed, Aug 8,

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

The simplest way right now is to enter "NoSQL" as a search string (I see two submissions right now) , but I agree a "track filter" would be useful. I'll ask Eldarion if they have one lying around ... regards Steve On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Thanks, Steve. > > How do I get a

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Thanks, Steve. How do I get access to the submissions for NoSQL track ? On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Done. > > S > > On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Steve: > > Can you add me, please ? > > yuzhih...@gmail.com > > > > NoSQL database track. > > > > Thank

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Done. S On Aug 8, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Steve: > Can you add me, please ? > yuzhih...@gmail.com > > NoSQL database track. > > Thanks -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Steve: Can you add me, please ? yuzhih...@gmail.com NoSQL database track. Thanks On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Added, thanks. > > S > > On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:21 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > > > Same for myself please > > > > I offered to help as back up for the NoSQ

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Added, thanks. S On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:21 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > Same for myself please > > I offered to help as back up for the NoSQL track. I am more than happy > to pick up a shovel where required to get through thr NoSQL proposals > as I expect there to be quite a few. > lewi...@a

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Tia: You'll need to create an account under that email address before we can add you to the reviewer team, please. regards Steve On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hi > Can you add me as a reviewer as well. > > i...@apache.org for the big data track. > > Tia > -- Steve H

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

gt; > > - Original Message - >> From: Ian Holsman >> To: "apachecon-discuss@apache.org" >> Cc: >> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 11:05 AM >> Subject: Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...) >> >> Hi >> Can you a

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

same here for the ApachEE track struberg [a@t] yahoo.de or struberg [a@t] apache.org LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Ian Holsman > To: "apachecon-discuss@apache.org" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 11:05 AM > Subject: Re: Access to pro

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Same for myself please I offered to help as back up for the NoSQL track. I am more than happy to pick up a shovel where required to get through thr NoSQL proposals as I expect there to be quite a few. lewi...@apache.org Thanks Lewis On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:51 AM, wrote: > Please add yuzhih...@

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi Can you add me as a reviewer as well. i...@apache.org for the big data track. Tia Sent from my iPhone On 08/08/2012, at 6:51 PM, yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote: > Please add yuzhih...@gmail.com as a reviewer. > > I am the track Chair for NoSQL Database track. > > Thanks > > > > On Aug

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Please add yuzhih...@gmail.com as a reviewer. I am the track Chair for NoSQL Database track. Thanks On Aug 7, 2012, at 11:06 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > On Aug 7, 2012, at 16:51 PM, Steve Holden wrote: > >> If you want to be a reviewer (tell your friends!) you just have to ask. Give >

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Aug 7, 2012, at 16:51 PM, Steve Holden wrote: > If you want to be a reviewer (tell your friends!) you just have to ask. Give > me the email address you are registered with at apachecon.eu and I will > invite you. Once invited you are free to invite other reviewers whose > opinions will help

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Donald Harbison wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Steve Holden wrote: > >> I don't think you need two separate accounts. That would, in fact, be >> unhealthy, since one account would then be able to comment and vote on the >> other's submissions. >> >> Do I t

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Did you add my email address as a reviewer as well? > Only just now, apparently. Sorry! S -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillysch

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Hi Steve, Did you add my email address as a reviewer as well? On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Steve Holden wrote: > > > There's no reason why others shouldn't be added as reviewers too. The more > the merrier, wouldn't you say? So unless there's a reason why the > shouldn't, I'd encourage the

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Steve Holden wrote: > I don't think you need two separate accounts. That would, in fact, be > unhealthy, since one account would then be able to comment and vote on the > other's submissions. > > Do I take it I should add dpharbi...@gmail.com? > Yes, please. I mi

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Done. S On Aug 7, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Olivier Heintz wrote: > olivier.hei...@nereide.fr -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com/ Conferences and technical event management at http://theope

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Le 07/08/2012 16:51, Steve Holden a écrit : If you want to be a reviewer (tell your friends!) you just have to ask. Give me the email address you are registered with at apachecon.eu and I will invite you. Once invited you are free to invite other reviewers whose opinions will help shape the c

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Done. Welcome! S On Aug 7, 2012, at 9:50 AM, David Nalley wrote: > ke4...@apache.org -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com/ Conferences and technical event management at http://theopenb

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

I don't think you need two separate accounts. That would, in fact, be unhealthy, since one account would then be able to comment and vote on the other's submissions. Do I take it I should add dpharbi...@gmail.com? regards Steve On Aug 7, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Donald Harbison wrote: > OK, I logge

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Happy to grant karma now I'm awake again. Please note that reviewer karma is > only available to those who already have an account in the review system. > Working through the spreadsheet the first four track chairs had no account - > at lea

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Happy to grant karma now I'm awake again. Please note that reviewer karma > is only available to those who already have an account in the review > system. Working through the spreadsheet the first four track chairs had no > account - at least

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Happy to grant karma now I'm awake again. Please note that reviewer karma is only available to those who already have an account in the review system. Working through the spreadsheet the first four track chairs had no account - at least, not under their apache.org address. So I decided to ask he

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Steve Holden wrote: The functionality is now available. Nick can invite further reviewers. I'm a bit busy at the moment, and won't have a chance to look at anything for at least 8 hours. Steve - would you be able to grant reviewing karma to all the track chairs as starte

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > > On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Donald Harbison wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Ross Gardler < > rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote: > >>> From the OpenOffice project perspective, we very muc

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Donald Harbison wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Ross Gardler >> wrote: >>> From the OpenOffice project perspective, we very much need to understand >> who/what has been submitted. With this knowledge, we can more effec

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Donald Harbison wrote: On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: From the OpenOffice project perspective, we very much need to understand who/what has been submitted. With this knowledge, we can more effectively make direct appeals to worthy members and participant

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

likewise for ApachEE :) LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Pierre Smits > To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 3:52 PM > Subject: Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...) > > From the OFBiz track perspec

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

>From the OFBiz track perspective we need the same. On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Donald Harbison wrote: > > > From the OpenOffice project perspective, we very much need to understand > who/what has been submitted. With this knowledge, we can more effectively > make direct appeals to worthy memb

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

Nice metaphore. On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll keep both eyes on this thread like a an eagle pulling a trout out of > a loch :0) > >

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 31 July 2012 17:06, Nick Burch wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> > >> When can we give chairs some visibility into their tracks? If its not > >> possible to give them log-in access can we export to a spreadsheet or >

Re: Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

+1 Ross If I am permitted to provide input into a reserve chair position then I would much rather begin work (or atleast provide assistance to the track chair if and when possible) sooner rather than later. I'll keep an both eyes on this thread like a an eagle pulling a trout out of a loch :0) On

Access to proposals (was Re: To extend or not...)

On 31 July 2012 17:06, Nick Burch wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ross Gardler wrote: >> >> When can we give chairs some visibility into their tracks? If its not >> possible to give them log-in access can we export to a spreadsheet or >> something on a periodic basis (ideally daily) > > > They'll ge

Re: To extend or not...

On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Pierre Smits wrote: Thanks for the karma granted. But I am not able to modify the home page of the site, as opposed to other pages. I've fixed the date on the homepage, thanks for the report! Steve - any ideas what's up with Pierre not being able to edit the home page? He

Re: To extend or not...

Nick, Thanks for the karma granted. But I am not able to modify the home page of the site, as opposed to other pages. Regards, Pierre 2012/8/1 Nick Burch > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Pierre Smits wrote: > >> I saw at the http://www.apachecon.eu website the headline of the CfP now >> shows the extens

Re: To extend or not...

On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Pierre Smits wrote: I saw at the http://www.apachecon.eu website the headline of the CfP now shows the extension till Monday 13th of August. Yup! As mentioned in another thread yesterday, the review system has been confirmed to be going live this week, and can run in parall

Re: To extend or not...

I saw at the http://www.apachecon.eu website the headline of the CfP now shows the extension till Monday 13th of August. But in the section 'Get involved' it still shows August 3rd. Regards, Pierre 2012/8/1 Nick Burch > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> Just as an example of the i

Re: To extend or not...

On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ross Gardler wrote: Just as an example of the importance of this, OpenOffice will pass 10M downloads sometime today. This will create a good amount of press buzz within the AOO community. It's an ideal time for the AOO PPMC to push the conference and the AOO track there. Gr

Re: To extend or not...

Just as an example of the importance of this, OpenOffice will pass 10M downloads sometime today. This will create a good amount of press buzz within the AOO community. It's an ideal time for the AOO PPMC to push the conference and the AOO track there. However, without any understanding of the curre

Re: To extend or not...

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> When can we give chairs some visibility into their tracks? If its not >> possible to give them log-in access can we export to a spreadsheet or >> something on a periodic basis (ideally daily) >> >

Re: To extend or not...

On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ross Gardler wrote: When can we give chairs some visibility into their tracks? If its not possible to give them log-in access can we export to a spreadsheet or something on a periodic basis (ideally daily) They'll get full visibility once the review system is in place. Stev

Re: To extend or not...

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > The deadline for submissions is in a few days. We had months of fog > and then a very short time for proposals to be submitted. This has > made it very very difficult for track chairs to drum up support - > people are on holiday, busy etc. To

To extend or not...

The deadline for submissions is in a few days. We had months of fog and then a very short time for proposals to be submitted. This has made it very very difficult for track chairs to drum up support - people are on holiday, busy etc. To make things worse I don't think track chairs are able to see w