[Apertium-stuff] GSoC11 Draft Proposal: Rule-based finite-state disambiguation

2011-04-01 Thread Mitchell Jeffrey
Hi all, Just leaving a draft proposal for the crows to pick at. I'd really appreciate some feedback from the more knowledgeable subscribers, particularly with regards to technical accuracy and the proposed deliverables/implementation schedule. Many thanks, Mitchell -- RULE BASED FINITE

Re: [Apertium-stuff] GSoC11 Draft Proposal: Rule-based finite-state disambiguation

2011-04-01 Thread Francis Tyers
El dv 01 de 04 de 2011 a les 18:05 +1100, en/na Mitchell Jeffrey va escriure: Hi all, Just leaving a draft proposal for the crows to pick at. I'd really appreciate some feedback from the more knowledgeable subscribers, particularly with regards to technical accuracy and the proposed

Re: [Apertium-stuff] GSoC11 Draft Proposal: Rule-based finite-state disambiguation

2011-04-01 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Mitchell Jeffrey buc...@gmail.com writes: [...] ##Synopsis Disambiguation is an essential part of the MT process, the aim of which is to correctly identify the meaning and function of each word of input text. Apertium currently uses a bigram/trigram part-of-speech tagger, which means

[Apertium-stuff] GSOC : Improvements to postedition interface

2011-04-01 Thread mougeyc
Application for : APERTIUM : Improvements to postedition interface Hi Everyone, my name is Mougey Camille, alias « commial » or « ajax ». I come from ENSIMAG, France, and I want to apply for the Google Summer of Code project named “Improvements to the Advanced Web Interface”. I'm really

Re: [Apertium-stuff] GSoC11 Draft Proposal: Rule-based finite-state disambiguation

2011-04-01 Thread Francis Tyers
El dv 01 de 04 de 2011 a les 10:53 +0200, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va escriure: Mitchell Jeffrey buc...@gmail.com writes: [...] [...] Additionally, some items in the grammar will be rule-based while others may (perhaps in future) be probabilistic. I would leave out that

Re: [Apertium-stuff] GSOC : Improvements to postedition interface

2011-04-01 Thread Luis Villarejo
Hi Mougey, thanks for your interest in the project and for the proposal. I find it very interesting, but also very ambitious for a three months period. Below you will find some comments. I suggest you to revise your plan trying to focus on some of the proposals you do since carrying on with all

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A little too late...

2011-04-01 Thread Mikel Forcada
$ gcc apertium_aprilfirst.cc apertium_aprilfirst.cc: In function ‘std::wstring readFullBlock(FILE*, wchar_t, wchar_t)’: apertium_aprilfirst.cc:65: error: ‘exit’ was not declared in this scope :-( On 04/01/2011 11:36 PM, Jimmy O'Regan wrote: I only got the idea to do this a couple of hours

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A little too late...

2011-04-01 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 1 April 2011 22:40, Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es wrote: $ gcc apertium_aprilfirst.cc apertium_aprilfirst.cc: In function ‘std::wstring readFullBlock(FILE*, wchar_t, wchar_t)’: apertium_aprilfirst.cc:65: error: ‘exit’ was not declared in this scope Aw. Damned gcc versions. Add #include

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A little too late...

2011-04-01 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 1 April 2011 22:42, Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 April 2011 22:40, Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es wrote: $ gcc apertium_aprilfirst.cc apertium_aprilfirst.cc: In function ‘std::wstring readFullBlock(FILE*, wchar_t, wchar_t)’: apertium_aprilfirst.cc:65: error: ‘exit’ was not

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A little too late...

2011-04-01 Thread Mikel Forcada
Even worse. Lots and lots of errors. WTF? /tmp/ccibbJCS.o: In function `readFullBlock(_IO_FILE*, wchar_t, wchar_t)': apertium_aprilfirst.cc:(.text+0x25): undefined reference to `std::allocatorwchar_t::allocator()' apertium_aprilfirst.cc:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A little too late...

2011-04-01 Thread pasquale minervini
I suspect Mikel compiled it with gcc, using g++ instead should do the job :) Happy weekend, Pasquale Minervini 2011/4/2 Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com: On 1 April 2011 22:59, Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 April 2011 22:45, Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es wrote: Even worse. Lots

Re: [Apertium-stuff] GSoC 2011 - Dictionary induction from wikis

2011-04-01 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 2 April 2011 00:22, Roman Zegarski roman.zegar...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for long time without response. I had some really exhausting days, and I couldn't find time, to get my thoughts together. But from now on, my response time will be much more acceptable. :) I see it was some discussion