Thanks everyone.
Just using -e indeed solved the problem. :)
I noticed the usage information was different from the man-page of
lt-proc. I updated this in r35321. Could someone who knows the options
check if i did so correctly?
Pim
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
wrote:
"Jimmy O'Regan"
writes:
> On 15 December 2011 10:13, Francis Tyers wrote:
>> El dj 15 de 12 de 2011 a les 10:42 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
>> va escriure:
>>> "Jimmy O'Regan"
>>> writes:
>>>
>>> > On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte wrote:
>>> >> I'm not sure how i should get the outp
On 15 December 2011 10:13, Francis Tyers wrote:
> El dj 15 de 12 de 2011 a les 10:42 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
> va escriure:
>> "Jimmy O'Regan"
>> writes:
>>
>> > On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte wrote:
>> >> I'm not sure how i should get the output of the analyser.
>> >>
>> >> but
Francis Tyers writes:
> El dj 15 de 12 de 2011 a les 10:42 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
> va escriure:
>> "Jimmy O'Regan"
>> writes:
>>
>> > On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte wrote:
>> >> I'm not sure how i should get the output of the analyser.
>> >>
>> >> but running the makefile it
El dj 15 de 12 de 2011 a les 10:42 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
va escriure:
> "Jimmy O'Regan"
> writes:
>
> > On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte wrote:
> >> I'm not sure how i should get the output of the analyser.
> >>
> >> but running the makefile itself results in an empty af-tagger-
"Jimmy O'Regan"
writes:
> On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte wrote:
>> I'm not sure how i should get the output of the analyser.
>>
>> but running the makefile itself results in an empty af-tagger-data/af.dic
>>
>> running this line: after creating af.dic.expand gives usage on lt-proc
>> usage
