Re: [Apertium-stuff] Tagger training

2011-12-15 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com writes: On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte otte@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure how i should get the output of the analyser. but running the makefile itself results in an empty af-tagger-data/af.dic running this line: after creating af.dic.expand gives

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Tagger training

2011-12-15 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com writes: El dj 15 de 12 de 2011 a les 10:42 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va escriure: Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com writes: On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte otte@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure how i should get the output of the analyser.

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Tagger training

2011-12-15 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 15 December 2011 10:13, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote: El dj 15 de 12 de 2011 a les 10:42 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va escriure: Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com writes: On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte otte@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure how i should get the

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Tagger training

2011-12-15 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com writes: On 15 December 2011 10:13, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote: El dj 15 de 12 de 2011 a les 10:42 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va escriure: Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com writes: On 14 December 2011 20:19, Pim Otte otte@gmail.com

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Tagger training

2011-12-15 Thread Pim Otte
Thanks everyone. Just using -e indeed solved the problem. :) I noticed the usage information was different from the man-page of lt-proc. I updated this in r35321. Could someone who knows the options check if i did so correctly? Pim On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer