Re: [Apertium-stuff] A pronoun problem

2012-01-05 Thread Bartias
Well, it works now. Thank you very much, Jimmy. Also thank you, Unhammer and Spectie. What I did not realise, was that I need two separate rules system, for transfering into PL and EN. Well, I did not realise more things, but that was the most obvious. I have actually tried to fix the problem

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A pronoun problem

2012-01-05 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 5 January 2012 11:37, Bartias wrote: >> (This is the default behaviour, which we can modify with rules. With >> this noun example, we don't rely on the number automatically passing, >> we ensure that it outputs, using .) >> >> The point is, where the remaining tags are different, you need to ad

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A pronoun problem

2012-01-05 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Bartias writes: > Hello again > > >> The default behaviour is to pass the remaining tags to the output, so >> as long as 1) the remaining tags will be the same; or 2) there is a >> transfer rule that can handle the movement of tags, then it's ok. >> >> In your dictionaries, you have: >> pl: >>

Re: [Apertium-stuff] A pronoun problem

2012-01-05 Thread Bartias
Hello again > The default behaviour is to pass the remaining tags to the output, so > as long as 1) the remaining tags will be the same; or 2) there is a > transfer rule that can handle the movement of tags, then it's ok. > > In your dictionaries, you have: > pl: > dom > dom > > en: > house