"Jimmy O'Regan" <jore...@gmail.com> writes: > On 30 April 2012 10:39, Jimmy O'Regan <jore...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 30 April 2012 10:21, Francis Tyers <fty...@prompsit.com> wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*, a new mode) >>> for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g. >>> >>> Input: >>> >>> ^cantar<vblex><pres><p1><sg>$ >>> ^de<pr>$ >> >> lt-proc -l > > ...by which I mean, 'that mode already exists, and it's -l (or --tagged-gen)'. > > I added it for feeding Apertium output into a speech synthesiser, so I > had no need for post-generation. Sergio originally committed it as > '-b' but later had a better candidate for 'b' so changed it to 'l'. He > must have missed 'k' :)
It seems to skip @-tagged words: $ echo kiteb|apertium -d . mt-ar-transfer ^@kiteb<vblex><past><p3><m><sg>$^.<sent>$ $ echo kiteb|apertium -d . mt-ar-transfer |lt-proc -l mt-ar.autogen.bin ^./.<sent>$ (bug or feature?) -Kevin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
