Al 02/11/2014 12:55 AM, En/na Xavi Ivars ha escrit:
> If it has, IMHO a good name for the pair could be
> apertium-ces-ces_hanakian: it would follow standard naming conventions
> while making explicit what it translates from/to.
+1
--
Mikel L. Forcada (http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/)
Departament
> The way I see it, there is no reason to create new low-level Java
> libraries. It is a dead or dying platform, and good riddance. Awful
> language to work with, with over-designed interfaces and horrible
> performance. And it's not even that portable! There's a reason Java's
> tagline was twisted
Does Hanakian has any BCP-47 tag (like Valencian Catalan has, ca_valencia)?
If it has, IMHO a good name for the pair could be
apertium-ces-ces_hanakian: it would follow standard naming conventions
while making explicit what it translates from/to.
--
Xavi Ivars
< http://xavi.ivars.me >
El dia 11/0
El dl 10 de 02 de 2014 a les 11:50 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
va escriure:
> Kevin Brubeck Unhammer writes:
>
> > Regarding multiwords with both and at once, I'm not even sure
> > what those should look like. But when I tested with ca-en they seem to
> > be included, except these inf+e
On Monday, February 10, 2014, Bernard Chardonneau
wrote:
> And why not rather creating a new code for Hanakian. As the most evident
> names like "han" and "hak" are already used for other languages, it could
> be a 4 letter code : "hana". That would make less strange.
>
> Or like it was done for
El dl 10 de 02 de 2014 a les 22:41 +, en/na Francis Tyers va
escriure:
> El dl 10 de 02 de 2014 a les 22:59 +0100, en/na Bernard Chardonneau va
> escriure:
> > > X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1
> > > Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:11:30 +
> > > From: Francis Tyers
> > > To: apertium-stuff@lists
El dl 10 de 02 de 2014 a les 22:59 +0100, en/na Bernard Chardonneau va
escriure:
> > X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1
> > Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:11:30 +
> > From: Francis Tyers
> > To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Reply-To: fty...@prompsit.com, apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.ne
> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1
> Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:11:30 +
> From: Francis Tyers
> To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> Reply-To: fty...@prompsit.com, apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] czech to hanakian language pair
>
>
> Hanakian has no ISO
* NEW DEADLINE: February 17 *
Call for Papers: 9th SaLTMiL workshop on “Free/open-source language
resources for the machine translation of less-resourced languages” at
LREC 2014
A full-day workshop at LREC 2014
Tuesday, 27 May 2014.
Reykjavik (Iceland)
SALTMIL: http://ixa2.si.ehu.es/
On 10 February 2014 16:45, Per Tunedal wrote:
> just curious. If those languages are dying, what platforms/programming
> languages are growing nowdays? What are the most fruitful new languages?
>
All mobile platforms are swinging towards native code, primarily written in
C++ or dialects (Obj-C
Hi,
just curious. If those languages are dying, what platforms/programming
languages are growing nowdays? What are the most fruitful new
languages?
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014, at 21:41, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
2014-02-09 20:49 GMT+01:00 Tino Didriksen
<[1]tino.didrik...@gmail.com>:
On 9 February 2014 17:40, Francis Tyers wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "ga79"
> To: "[apertium:wiki] "
> Cc:
> Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 14:07:30 +
> Subject: [apertium:wiki] Discussion for Home page
>
> I've found an error on apertium 3.2 during configure stage. The p
Kevin Brubeck Unhammer writes:
> Regarding multiwords with both and at once, I'm not even sure
> what those should look like. But when I tested with ca-en they seem to
> be included, except these inf+es entries which keeps getting trimmed
> out:
>
> canviar-se d':canviar+es# de
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
