Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Hi Francis, Francis Tyers writes: > I think it is time to do a new release of apertium and lttoolbox. I agree with your reasoning; the changes justify a new release. However, that's not the only reason a release is due. Speaking as a packager, frequent minor updates with fewer features are bette

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
"Jim O'Regan" writes: > On 25 March 2014 13:14, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote: [...] >> While on the subject of things that could be sorted out before a >> release, why are some XML validation files .rng and some .dtd? And why >> does apertium include files for lttoolbox formats? >> >> lttoolbo

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Jacob Nordfalk
+1 Jacob -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition i

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Francis Tyers
El dt 25 de 03 de 2014 a les 12:17 +, en/na Jim O'Regan va escriure: > On 25 March 2014 11:05, Francis Tyers wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I think it is time to do a new release of apertium and lttoolbox. This > > release would be the 3.3 release. If you are wondering why, here are > > so

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Mikel L. Forcada
+1 El 25/03/14 12:57, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer ha escrit: Francis Tyers writes: Hello everyone, I think it is time to do a new release of apertium and lttoolbox. +1 -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Jim O'Regan
On 25 March 2014 13:14, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote: > "Jim O'Regan" writes: > >> On 25 March 2014 11:05, Francis Tyers >> wrote: > > [...] > >>> I think this should be fairly convincing. Does anyone have any >>> objections ? Also, feel free to bring up some new features that I have >>> forgott

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread aboobacker sidheeque mk
+1 On 3/25/14, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote: > "Jim O'Regan" writes: > >> On 25 March 2014 11:05, Francis Tyers >> wrote: > > [...] > >>> I think this should be fairly convincing. Does anyone have any >>> objections ? Also, feel free to bring up some new features that I have >>> forgotten. >>>

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
"Jim O'Regan" writes: > On 25 March 2014 11:05, Francis Tyers > wrote: [...] >> I think this should be fairly convincing. Does anyone have any >> objections ? Also, feel free to bring up some new features that I have >> forgotten. >> > > I believe this would be the first version of lt-comp tha

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Jim O'Regan
On 25 March 2014 11:05, Francis Tyers wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I think it is time to do a new release of apertium and lttoolbox. This > release would be the 3.3 release. If you are wondering why, here are > some new unreleased features: > > ==lttoolbox== > > * lt-print: a program to print out

Re: [Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Francis Tyers writes: > Hello everyone, > > I think it is time to do a new release of apertium and lttoolbox. +1 -- Kevin Brubeck Unhammer Sent from my emacs pgpjvfHp74OTy.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Learn Gra

[Apertium-stuff] new release of lttoolbox and Apertium

2014-03-25 Thread Francis Tyers
Hello everyone, I think it is time to do a new release of apertium and lttoolbox. This release would be the 3.3 release. If you are wondering why, here are some new unreleased features: ==lttoolbox== * lt-print: a program to print out binary transducers in ATT format. * lt-comp: will now comp