Replied inline...
On 10 February 2015 at 08:24, Per Tunedal wrote:
> I've got this strange message:
>
> Package: languages/apertium-swe
> started: Tue Feb 10 07:13:28 UTC 2015
> latest: 0.1.0~r58796
> existing: 0.1.0~r58773-1
> distv: 1
> launching rebuild
Hi,
any plans to merge the Danish monodictionaries?
Yours,
Per Tunedal
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
h
Hi,
I've got this strange message:
Package: languages/apertium-swe
started: Tue Feb 10 07:13:28 UTC 2015
latest: 0.1.0~r58796
existing: 0.1.0~r58773-1
distv: 1
launching rebuild
data only
stopped: Tue Feb 10 07:18:25 UTC 2015
FAILED:
A 2015-02-09 21:13, Per Tunedal escrigué:
> Hi,
> I've tried:
>
> lt-expand *.swe.dix | grep -v ':[<>]:' | cut -f1 -d: >
> sv.mini_new.expanded
>
> It doesn't work. "Invalid construction"
Your dictionary doesn't validate:
fran@zarema:~/source/apertium/languages/apertium-swe$ make
apertium-valid
Hi,
I've tried:
lt-expand *.swe.dix | grep -v ':[<>]:' | cut -f1 -d: >
sv.mini_new.expanded
It doesn't work. "Invalid construction"
Yours,
Per Tunedal
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Webs
A 2015-02-09 20:36, Per Tunedal escrigué:
> Hi,
> I've got stuck:
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 10:24, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
>> Per Tunedal
>> writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > Now I've merged apertium-sv-da.sv.dix into apertium-swe.swe.dix. Kevin,
>> > would you please make apertium-sv-da depend
Hi,
I've got stuck:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 10:24, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
> Per Tunedal
> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > Now I've merged apertium-sv-da.sv.dix into apertium-swe.swe.dix. Kevin,
> > would you please make apertium-sv-da depend on
> > languages/apertium-swe with that little change t
A 2015-02-08 12:38, Francis Tyers escrigué:
> Dear all,
>
> The deadline for applications for the Google Summer of Code 2015 is on
> the 20th of February and the application process opens tomorrow. If we
> are thinking of applying then we should start writing the application,
> getting our ideas p
Hi Francis,
Yes, I noted that a long time ago and have used some of those entries.
"Goldwashing from SALDO". I was trying to find words from my corpus and
got some.
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 10:31, Francis Tyers wrote:
> A 2015-02-09 10:24, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer escrigué:
> > Per
Hello,
Thank you for the help.
Regards,
Sindhuja
On Monday, February 9, 2015, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
wrote:
> Sindhuja Reddy
> > writes:
>
> > Hello,
> > Here I am attaching the links to the screenshots of the output of each
> > module.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sindhuja
> >
> > http://imgur.com/LVg
I saw that there was this discussion going about swe dix and SALDO. Is
there any need for other words from different POS? I have the
complete SALDO corpus on my pc in case somebody needs that.
-Joonas
--
--
Dive into the
Sindhuja Reddy
writes:
> Hello,
> Here I am attaching the links to the screenshots of the output of each
> module.
>
> Regards,
> Sindhuja
>
> http://imgur.com/LVg4eDS
> http://imgur.com/mjLpHOM
> http://imgur.com/hlpu8OM
> http://imgur.com/mScUQDT
> http://imgur.com/qqdcMhU
> http://imgur.com/Ph
A 2015-02-09 10:24, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer escrigué:
> Per Tunedal
> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>> Now I've merged apertium-sv-da.sv.dix into apertium-swe.swe.dix.
>> Kevin,
>> would you please make apertium-sv-da depend on
>> languages/apertium-swe with that little change to the makefiles.
>>
>> I supp
Per Tunedal
writes:
> Hi,
> Now I've merged apertium-sv-da.sv.dix into apertium-swe.swe.dix. Kevin,
> would you please make apertium-sv-da depend on
> languages/apertium-swe with that little change to the makefiles.
>
> I suppose I would better move the apertium-sv-da.sv.dix to another
> folder
14 matches
Mail list logo