2017-10-29, Xavi Ivars sanoi:
> Is it possible to use in bidixes?
>
> [...]
>
> Anyone has ever used it?
I've been using it apertium-fin-{eng,deu} a bit, it seems to work for
my cases so I'm not sure what the rest of the thread is a bout?
Here's an excerpt from apertium-fin-eng.fin-eng.dix,
El 2017-10-29 19:22, Xavi Ivars escribió:
2017-10-29 19:15 GMT+01:00 Francis Tyers :
It isn't possible and isn't supposed to be, the new
apertium-separable
module could be used for this kind of thing. :)
Even when you don't want the words to be separable?
The use case we were thinking was
2017-10-29 19:15 GMT+01:00 Francis Tyers :
>
>>
> It isn't possible and isn't supposed to be, the new apertium-separable
> module could be used for this kind of thing. :)
>
>
Even when you don't want the words to be separable?
The use case we were thinking was for cases like
marrycasar+se
(Marc
El 2017-10-29 19:08, Xavi Ivars escribió:
Hi,
Is it possible to use in bidixes?
With Marc, we identified a few cases in the apertium-eng-cat bidix
that would really benefit of using . We're not sure if that's not
possible, or if it's supposed to work but it doesn't :)
It isn't possible and i
Hi,
Is it possible to use in bidixes?
With Marc, we identified a few cases in the apertium-eng-cat bidix that
would really benefit of using . We're not sure if that's not possible,
or if it's supposed to work but it doesn't :)
Anyone has ever used it?
Thanks!
--
< Xavi Ivars >
< http://xavi.
