I added some more pros as well as a few cons.
http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC_proposals/Use_Material_Design#In_detail
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:52 AM Jonathan Washington <
jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's not a good reason to choose something. As you yourself were
> noting abou
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 19:48, Jonathan Washington <
jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 7 apr 2020, Ç.a. tarixində 05:44 tarixində Tino Didriksen <
> m...@tinodidriksen.com> yazdı:
>
>> On 2015-11-25, I started seriously looking into getting all the C++ tools
>> running natively on Android.
That's not a good reason to choose something. As you yourself were
noting about our use of certain frameworks in html-tools, popularity
isn't a good criterion.
The way this should work is the proposer (potentially with other
interested parties) does a thorough review of the options and opens up
d
7 apr 2020, Ç.a. tarixində 05:44 tarixində Tino Didriksen <
m...@tinodidriksen.com> yazdı:
> Well, that makes sense from a security point of view. And that is a good
> reason to revive the native port, which I talked about on IRC but never
> wrote about to the mailing list.
>
> IRC logs:
>
> https
No particular reason, it just seems fairly popular.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 10:45 Jonathan Washington <
jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why Material and not some other standard?
>
> --
> Jonathan
>
> 8 apr 2020, Ç. tarixində 16:02 tarixində Samuel Sloniker
> yazdı:
> >
> > (for the next P
Why Material and not some other standard?
--
Jonathan
8 apr 2020, Ç. tarixində 16:02 tarixində Samuel Sloniker
yazdı:
>
> (for the next PMC)
> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC_proposals/Use_Material_Design
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Aperti
