Thank you for your proposal. You seem to have rushed to submit it even
though there are still several days to go. The result is that there are
many formatting errors that make it difficult to read. It doesn't make a
good impression for someone who is supposed to be meticulous in creating
code so as
I created a good proposal that has many UI and backend improvements, I
hope it appeals you !
https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium:HazemShehawy
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li
Thanks a million, Tino
Mikel
El 26/3/23 a les 21:32, Tino Didriksen ha escrit:
The replacement is https://github.com/apertium/apertium-omegat-native
- which admittedly also needs updating, but it's far easier to get
functional again.
-- Tino Didriksen
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 21:06, Felipe S
The replacement is https://github.com/apertium/apertium-omegat-native -
which admittedly also needs updating, but it's far easier to get functional
again.
-- Tino Didriksen
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 21:06, Felipe Sánchez Martínez
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I guess that the Apertium plugin for OmegaT is
Hi all,
I guess that the Apertium plugin for OmegaT is running internally lttoolbox-java. I do no
have information on the amount of people using this plugin, but I guess there are some (me
for example). How much time would it cost to port the latter developments to Java?
Regards
Felipe
El 2
[CC apertium-stuff & PMC]
Cf. https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/34
Given that lttoolbox-java and its downstream dependents have been falling
further and further behind the native tools, I say we formally deprecate
the Java port, mark all related wiki pages with a warning, and archiv
