Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es writes:
HI there.
A quick quirk. I may go through the rest of the message later.
Al 11/15/2011 12:16 AM, En/na Kevin Donnelly ha escrit:
Re Fran's trivial stemming being OK for a tagger, but not for an MT system,
On 16 Nov 2011 11:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer unham...@fsfe.org wrote:
Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com
writes:
On 16 November 2011 05:56, Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es wrote:
On other matters, I had to search for tupp'orth (=twopence worth,
apparently, in the sense of my [humble]
HI there.
A quick quirk. I may go through the rest of the message later.
Al 11/15/2011 12:16 AM, En/na Kevin Donnelly ha escrit:
Re Fran's trivial stemming being OK for a tagger, but not for an MT system,
Hi
It was so interesting to read the responses! I don't want to hog the list, so
I'll just pick out 3 of the most engaging points in this post and then sidle
back towards lurking mode :-)
Re Fran's trivial stemming being OK for a tagger, but not for an MT system,
On 14 November 2011 23:16, Kevin Donnelly ke...@dotmon.com wrote:
Hi
It was so interesting to read the responses! I don't want to hog the list, so
I'll just pick out 3 of the most engaging points in this post and then sidle
back towards lurking mode :-)
Re Fran's trivial stemming being OK
Dear Kevin, dear Apertiumers:
as Francis said, thanks for such a long and detailed answer. It took me
a while to read it and I think I won't comment all you said, especially
since there are things I don't really understand well and I should ask.
But here's my first thoughts after a first
El dg 13 de 11 de 2011 a les 10:12 +0100, en/na Mikel Forcada va
escriure:
Dear Kevin, dear Apertiumers:
[snip]
I think this is an interesting discussion and that we should have some
kind of rethinking apertium project or conference or un-conference.
Many of these limitations, such as the
On 13 November 2011 12:41, Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 November 2011 22:11, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote:
El ds 12 de 11 de 2011 a les 21:15 +, en/na Kevin Donnelly va
e
p
lices/l
rexs n=n/s n=pl//r
/p
/e
e
p
On Saturday 12 November 2011 Jimmy O'Regan said
If you check back through the archives, you'll see that there has been
discussion recently about an interface for adding words. A number of
people have worked on it, and it's a more difficult task than you
might expect.
FWIW, I think the
Al 11/12/2011 10:31 AM, En/na Kevin Donnelly ha escrit:
On Saturday 12 November 2011 Jimmy O'Regan said
If you check back through the archives, you'll see that there has been
discussion recently about an interface for adding words. A number of
people have worked on it, and it's a more
The point is that while working, for example, at tr-az, we realized that our
lexicon (the only available under GPL blabla) sucked big time. Replacing
misplaced stems (i have a personal statistic saying that ~30% are misplaced) is
dull, time consuming and can be definitely
Hi Mikel
On Saturday 12 November 2011 Mikel Forcada said
Al 11/12/2011 10:31 AM, En/na Kevin Donnelly ha escrit:
FWIW, I think the fundamental problem is that the format of the
dictionaries is non-optimal from a linguistic point of view.
Kevin, it would be good to hear a bit more
Hi everybody!
With the new google thing approaching I had an idea. We get many students
(mostly for the GSOC) which are technically capable of performing what I find
hard task, and we keep wasting their time with the boring and skill-less
process of adding words to bidix. Now, considering that
On 12 November 2011 01:23, Gıanluca ggro...@mail.com wrote:
Hi everybody!
With the new google thing approaching I had an idea. We get many students
(mostly for the GSOC) which are technically capable of performing what I find
hard task, and we keep wasting their time with the boring and
14 matches
Mail list logo
