On 26 January 2011 11:13, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
> "Jimmy O'Regan" writes:
>
>> On 26 January 2011 09:34, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The -z option makes lt-proc flush whenever it sees the null character,
>>> which is nice. But if you don't give it -z, it exits on the nu
"Jimmy O'Regan" writes:
> On 26 January 2011 09:34, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The -z option makes lt-proc flush whenever it sees the null character,
>> which is nice. But if you don't give it -z, it exits on the null
>> character -- I'm guessing it shouldn't...
>>
>
> Yeah, thou
On 26 January 2011 09:34, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The -z option makes lt-proc flush whenever it sees the null character,
> which is nice. But if you don't give it -z, it exits on the null
> character -- I'm guessing it shouldn't...
>
Yeah, though I think it's one of those things t
Hi,
The -z option makes lt-proc flush whenever it sees the null character,
which is nice. But if you don't give it -z, it exits on the null
character -- I'm guessing it shouldn't...
Added a bug here:
http://bugs.apertium.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108
(I got a null character out when