On 16 May 2012 08:24, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer unham...@fsfe.org wrote:
$ echo kiteb|apertium -d . mt-ar-transfer
^@kitebvblexpastp3msg$^.sent$
$ echo kiteb|apertium -d . mt-ar-transfer |lt-proc -l mt-ar.autogen.bin
^./.sent$
(bug or feature?)
Bug. I'll take a look.
--
Sefam Are any of the
Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com
writes:
On 30 April 2012 10:39, Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2012 10:21, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote:
Hello all,
What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*, a new mode)
for lt-proc where we can generate keeping
Hello all,
What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*, a new mode)
for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g.
Input:
^cantarvblexpresp1sg$
^depr$
Normal output '-g':
canto
~de
Output with '-k -g' mode:
^canto/cantarvblexpresp1sg$
^~de/depr$
On 30 April 2012 10:21, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote:
Hello all,
What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*, a new mode)
for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g.
Input:
^cantarvblexpresp1sg$
^depr$
lt-proc -l
--
Sefam Are any of the
Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com writes:
Hello all,
What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*, a new mode)
for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g.
Input:
^cantarvblexpresp1sg$
^depr$
Normal output '-g':
canto
~de
Output with '-k
On 30 April 2012 10:39, Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2012 10:21, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote:
Hello all,
What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*, a new mode)
for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g.
Input:
