Re: [Apertium-stuff] suggestion for lt-proc generation

2012-05-17 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 16 May 2012 08:24, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer unham...@fsfe.org wrote: $ echo kiteb|apertium -d . mt-ar-transfer ^@kitebvblexpastp3msg$^.sent$ $ echo kiteb|apertium -d . mt-ar-transfer |lt-proc -l mt-ar.autogen.bin ^./.sent$ (bug or feature?) Bug. I'll take a look. -- Sefam Are any of the

Re: [Apertium-stuff] suggestion for lt-proc generation

2012-05-16 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com writes: On 30 April 2012 10:39, Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 April 2012 10:21, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote: Hello all, What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*,  a new mode) for lt-proc where we can generate keeping

[Apertium-stuff] suggestion for lt-proc generation

2012-04-30 Thread Francis Tyers
Hello all, What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*, a new mode) for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g. Input: ^cantarvblexpresp1sg$ ^depr$ Normal output '-g': canto ~de Output with '-k -g' mode: ^canto/cantarvblexpresp1sg$ ^~de/depr$

Re: [Apertium-stuff] suggestion for lt-proc generation

2012-04-30 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 30 April 2012 10:21, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote: Hello all, What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*,  a new mode) for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g. Input:  ^cantarvblexpresp1sg$  ^depr$ lt-proc -l -- Sefam Are any of the

Re: [Apertium-stuff] suggestion for lt-proc generation

2012-04-30 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com writes: Hello all, What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*, a new mode) for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g. Input: ^cantarvblexpresp1sg$ ^depr$ Normal output '-g': canto ~de Output with '-k

Re: [Apertium-stuff] suggestion for lt-proc generation

2012-04-30 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On 30 April 2012 10:39, Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 April 2012 10:21, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote: Hello all, What do you think about having a new mode (yes, *groan*,  a new mode) for lt-proc where we can generate keeping the lexical form, e.g. Input: