onment is broken right now. I'll test those
later.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 05/16/2018 10:25 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
I finally committed the new parser. I did my best to have the same
API, so ou can use it as if it were the previous version, except that
rsion. And the I can run the tests with my
private directory server ZOO.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 04/15/2018 11:03 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to speedup the schema parsing (it's currently quite slow, due
to the 3 embedded Antlr
hings that are wrong.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 09/08/2017 04:11 PM, CRAIG BENNER wrote:
Thanks Shawn, I was going to ask that. But I got wireshark working. Below is
the packet I'm assuming we want to see. In concept it looks correct, but i'm
not sure wh
to be very rare. If you start with existing control that
is somehow similar it is not difficult to implement a new control.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
(org.apache.directory.api.ldap.extras.controls.ad.AdDirSync). It is
enough to have some basic idea how LDAP protocol works and how the API
works. Most of the work is mostly copy&paste. There are 3-4 classes to
create. It is not difficult to figure out.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 09/03/2017 0
Hi,
This looks like a nice development. Thanks. I'll test it with my
multi-LDAP testbed. But it will take a week or two until I get to that.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 01/23/2017 10:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
a quick update on what'
se ConnectionManager and let the API do the
smart stuff. One way or another the "main" code will use the operations
from LdapConnection interface.
But this is not a simple thing to do. I would suggest not to hold the
1.0 release and plan this for 2.0. For this to work well we will n
NoOp. I've tried with both OpenLDAP and OpenDJ schema.
Anyway, thanks for answer. Now I know that it is supported to be a
different normalizer - as I thought. So I can look for the problem.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
rmalized.
And therefore DNs such as dc=EXAMPLE,dc=COM and dc=example,dc=com are
considered to be different.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
s another thing that. But that can wait. Let's have
the 1.0 release out so we can start fixing things properly.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 05/10/2016 03:08 PM, Radovan Semancik wrote:
We should add a LdapConnectionTimeOutException class for that purpose.
OK, thanks. I'll do that tomorrow and I'll test it. After that I'm OK for the
release.
This small improvement is committed and tested. So I'm gree
ure that is
not enabled by default.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
ly need an review from someone else (Emmanuel?)
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
- Original Message -
> From: "Kristinn Örn Sigurðsson"
> To: api@directory.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:12:38 PM
> Subject: Re: New LDAP client p
> We should add a LdapConnectionTimeOutException class for that purpose.
OK, thanks. I'll do that tomorrow and I'll test it. After that I'm OK for the
release.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
ng would not be that easy to do. I see that as something that is
definitely after 1.0.0. SASL external would be nice, but if there is nobody to
work on that in next couple of weeks (not me) then I see no point holding back
1.0.0. just for that.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
" has some date :-)
At least some estimate.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
s. Is InvalidConnectionException the same
situation as timeout? Wouldn't we want a new TimeOutException for this
(as subclass of LdapException)? Or is there any other (e.g. Mina-based)
mechanism for this?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
Hi,
Congrats. This looks like a great improvement.
But ... it would be probably good to release API 1.0.0 before you merge
in the branch. Any plans for that?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 05/09/2016 12:38 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
that's it, I&#
ertain to break
client code compatibility.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
fashion? E.g.
prepare the string only if someone asks for it and then store the
prepared value for the entire Value lifetime. If Value is immutable then
this approach should be safe.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 03/24/2016 12:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys
is usually some application-specific logic involved it is
perhaps not the best candidate to invest the development time.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 03/04/2016 12:34 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 03/03/16 22:52, SG a écrit :
I' am using LDAP API 1.0.0-M33
in a day. So
gradually improving the status quo seems to be a good way to take.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 01/29/2016 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 29/01/16 10:06, Maxim Solodovnik a écrit :
sorry for cross-posting, but I have no response in user list
OK for me. I've checked our tests and everything seems to work fine with
the latest trunk.
On 09/24/2015 05:48 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to cut a release of teh API soon enough. Is there any objection ?
thanks !
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
ted this magnitude of schema
inconsistencies either. I guess that the real world always has a bunch
of surprises in store, no matter how experienced you are.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
ork. Speaking politically correctly this is a little bit
of a mess :-) I deserves to be cleaned up.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 09/15/2015 02:46 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 15/09/15 14:39, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit :
Forwarding this mail who deserves to be s
bout the server and the studio. So I've figured it is better to
stay on the safe side and discuss that before implementing it.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
relaxed mode to the registries
(OidRegistry class). Set this up when the registries are created. Skip
the Oid.isOid() check when in relaxed mode.
I can quickly implement any of these options. But as usual, I need a
blessing :-)
What do you think?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
ctiveConnectio ns' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40{64512}
X-NDS_NAME 'RADIUS:Active Con nections' X-NDS_NOT_SCHED_SYNC_IMMEDIATE '1' )
I could not believe my eyes when I've seen that. I still hope that this
is really some kind of my error. But I have confirmed it in two
to work with
UTF-8, whoich would be a major burden.
If the server is using StringValue then you will not need to change
anything. Interface will remain the same and behavior compatible (if you
do not think about "comaptible bugs" of course).
Life is complicated...
Maybe not that much :-)
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 08/10/2015 03:10 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 10/08/15 13:33, Radovan Semancik a écrit :
On 08/10/2015 12:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
There is no flag that says an Attribute is H-R or not. The
information is provided in RFC 22524.3.2
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2252#section-4.
lve this kind of issues. This specific eDir GUID problem
is probably my fault as the Studio seems to work with the GUID without
any problems. I'll report on that later when I investigate it. Anyway,
the API is currently not very intuitive with the BinaryValue,
StringValue and H/R flags. Simplification will be a great help for new
API users.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
te cannot be
added is lost. I cannot report back to the higher layers anything better
than "failed to add foo to bar". But the user will not know what was the
reason.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 03/20/2015 04:07 PM, Radovan Semancik wrote:
https://github.com/Evolveum/directory-shared/commit/b941ff690a41cd03b31679759dcf2fb367b1cb83
I had a closer look at this. Tests are failing after my modification.
The reason seems to be this: (Registries:1344)
public List add( List errors
On 03/20/2015 02:42 PM, Radovan Semancik wrote:
I'll commit that to my github version once I got OpenLDAP roughly
working. I hope to have it in an hour or two. Then you can have a look
and check whether I haven't produced some disaster (which may happen).
So. here it is:
https://
ting LDAP servers
has some issues, but honestly I haven't expected that it is such a disaster.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
.
Let me experiment with this a bit using real OpenLDAP and 389ds
instances. I'll report the results.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
ime I have discovered that the SchemaManager and
Registries have "relaxed" mode. I'm trying to use that to get the
(hugely) tolerant behavior that I'm looking for. As an experiment. Let's
see how it goes.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
error
be muted when a quirks mode is on? Or is that too much and we need
something like superquirks mode? ;-) The studio obviously works with
OpenLDAP. Does anybody know how does the studio manages this?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
for it in "directory-shared", but I have tested it
with my LDAP Connector and OpenDJ and it seems to work fine.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
directory API with these
modifications seems to work well with OpenDJ 2.6.2 (including good
schema support). Testing with OpenLDAP and 389ds will follow.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
Hi,
Yes, of course. That was exactly my goal.
... and I thank you!
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 03/08/2015 06:17 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
ng real LDAP servers?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 03/05/2015 07:08 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
We declare the tags in a XXXTags file, like in :
public enu
I assume that there is a nicer way to do that. I
mean the encoding of this part of VLV request control:
target CHOICE { ...
--
Radovan Semancik
On 03/05/2015 05:16 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 05/03/15 16:32, Radovan Semancik a écrit :
On 03/05/2015 02:50 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Ok, I created a JIRA for this one :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-223
And I fixed it too.
It should now work as expected.
It looks
VirtualListView (VLV)
request and response controls in the API. Therefore I'm implementing it now.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
seemed to me as
an obvious bug.
But when I've changed it to "return true" then the
SchemaObjectRendererTest fails ... in a quite strange way (NPE). I do
not feel to be very strong here and I'm not really sure what I'm doing.
Could anyone please have a look and help me
antlr encoures? Or some other trick?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 01/27/2015 11:50 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I have modified the DefaultSchemaLoader constructor to load the schema
fr
rse
also OpenLDAP) all seems to support subschemasubentry in root DSE. And
they all return the schema in what seems to be the RFC format. There may
be some issues, of course. But it looks like that the support for these
servers should not be difficult to implement.
--
r servers later on.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
n of what you want
to do in order to drive you toward the various classes of teh API.
Maybe if you can describe how to support OpenLDAP server there I
think I can figure out the rest.
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
his is the right way to build it ... is there
anything that I should read to be able to contribute? Or some
recommendations?
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
51 matches
Mail list logo
