Re: [apparmor] Can't use aa on 3.8.6 kernel!

2013-04-09 Thread John Johansen
On 04/08/2013 10:57 PM, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hi, I'm running Arch with 3.8.6. kernel, and I got it patched with 2.8.1 releases. But aa-status got errors, apparmor module is loaded. apparmor filesystem is not mounted. Any ideas? P.S securityfs is mounted, mount shows: securityfs

Re: [apparmor] Can't use aa on 3.8.6 kernel!

2013-04-09 Thread Aaron Lewis
Hi John! On 01:38 Tue 09 Apr , John Johansen wrote: On 04/08/2013 10:57 PM, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hi, I'm running Arch with 3.8.6. kernel, and I got it patched with 2.8.1 releases. But aa-status got errors, apparmor module is loaded. apparmor filesystem is not mounted.

Re: [apparmor] Can't use aa on 3.8.6 kernel!

2013-04-09 Thread John Johansen
On 04/09/2013 01:58 AM, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hi John! On 01:38 Tue 09 Apr , John Johansen wrote: On 04/08/2013 10:57 PM, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hi, I'm running Arch with 3.8.6. kernel, and I got it patched with 2.8.1 releases. But aa-status got errors, apparmor module is loaded.

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH] audio and base abstraction updates

2013-04-09 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Montag, 8. April 2013 schrieb Jamie Strandboge: Recent kernels/glibc also now trigger reads for /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory. This is explained in both malloc(3) and proc(5). Basically, there are different memory allocation strategies and /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory contains

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH] audio and base abstraction updates

2013-04-09 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On 04/09/2013 06:36 AM, Christian Boltz wrote: Hello, Am Montag, 8. April 2013 schrieb Jamie Strandboge: Recent kernels/glibc also now trigger reads for /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory. This is explained in both malloc(3) and proc(5). Basically, there are different memory allocation