Hi,
i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not working when used
alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with this:
audit /home/** a,
audit /home/** w,
By only logging you mean logging of an access but not granting permission?
I mean logging of an access AND granting permi
On 06/30/2013 12:45 AM, azurIt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not working when
> used alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with this:
> audit /home/** a,
> audit /home/** w,
By only logging you mean logging of an access bu
Hi,
i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not working when used
alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with this:
audit /home/** a,
audit /home/** w,
By only logging you mean logging of an access but not granting permission?
I mean logging of an access AND granting permi
On 06/28/2013 04:49 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Impressive email, thanks.
>
> I can't begin to address all the open questions you raised, but we have
> to start somewhere, so here's my stab at what I felt was most important:
>
> Pairing
>
> You've very nearly convinced me that for the various forms
On 06/28/2013 11:55 PM, John Johansen wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 01:57 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> I had to trim this down and focus on one section that has been bothering
>> me. It is based upon the idea that we can do away with pairing. While I
>> mostly agree, DBus intricacies were making it difficult
On 06/30/2013 02:56 AM, azurIt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not working
>>> when used alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with this:
>>> audit /home/** a,
>>> audit /home/** w,
>> By only logging you mean logging o
Hi,
i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not working
when used alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with this:
audit /home/** a,
audit /home/** w,
>>> By only logging you mean logging of an access but not granting
>
On 06/30/2013 04:02 AM, azurIt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not working
> when used alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with this:
> audit /home/** a,
> audit /home/** w,
By only logging you
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not working
>> when used alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with this:
>> audit /home/** a,
>> audit /home/** w,
> By only logging you mean logging of an access but n
On 06/30/2013 06:44 AM, azurIt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not
>>> working when used alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with
>>> this:
>>> audit /home/** a,
>>> audit /home/** w,
On 06/30/2013 03:25 PM, John Johansen wrote:
> On 06/30/2013 06:44 AM, azurIt wrote:
Hi,
i'm having problems with audit rule modifier - it's just not
working when used alone. I'm trying to enable only logging with
this:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:23:15AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 11:05 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Using --subdomainfs without an argument triggers a segfault. This was due
> > to the long option missing the "has_arg" flag.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
> >
> >
> > === modified fi
12 matches
Mail list logo
