Re: [apparmor] apparmor policy versioning

2013-07-18 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On 07/18/2013 07:24 PM, John Johansen wrote: > On 07/18/2013 01:02 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >> On 07/17/2013 05:57 PM, John Johansen wrote: >>> On 07/11/2013 12:55 PM, Christian Boltz wrote: > v2 policies can stay > as v2 until we test them under v3 and then have them in both. I think >>

Re: [apparmor] apparmor policy versioning

2013-07-18 Thread John Johansen
On 07/18/2013 01:02 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On 07/17/2013 05:57 PM, John Johansen wrote: >> On 07/11/2013 12:55 PM, Christian Boltz wrote: v2 policies can stay as v2 until we test them under v3 and then have them in both. I think we need to do it this way since people might reb

[apparmor] GSoC review r17..22

2013-07-18 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, the attached files contain my review notes for r17..22. In case you miss the files for r19 and r20: that's intentional, those commits look so good that I don't need to comment on them ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Jungs. Mit dem Argument kann ich kaputte Autos verkaufen und dann erk

Re: [apparmor] apparmor policy versioning

2013-07-18 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On 07/17/2013 05:57 PM, John Johansen wrote: > On 07/11/2013 12:55 PM, Christian Boltz wrote: >>> v2 policies can stay >>> as v2 until we test them under v3 and then have them in both. I think >>> we need to do it this way since people might reboot into different >>> kernels and while policy should