[apparmor] [PATCH 4/4] Allow Totem to use personal Grilo data: bookmarks, etc.

2013-09-25 Thread intrigeri
From: intrigeri --- ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem index bc8c0da..973001f 100644 --- a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem +++ b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem @@ -34,3 +34,4 @@

[apparmor] [PATCH 3/4] Allow Totem to access the Tracker database.

2013-09-25 Thread intrigeri
From: intrigeri --- ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem index 78f7904..bc8c0da 100644 --- a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem +++ b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem @@ -31,3 +31,6 @@

[apparmor] Support Totem 3.8.2

2013-09-25 Thread intrigeri
This patchset updates the Totem abstraction to make it work nicely on current Debian sid (that is, mostly GNOME 3.8). -- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

[apparmor] [PATCH 1/4] Allow Totem to use libproxy modules.

2013-09-25 Thread intrigeri
From: intrigeri --- ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem index a6a4a76..8284b49 100644 --- a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem +++ b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem @@ -29,3 +29,4 @@

[apparmor] [PATCH 2/4] Allow Totem to use GNOME keyring's PKCS#11 support.

2013-09-25 Thread intrigeri
From: intrigeri --- ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem index 8284b49..78f7904 100644 --- a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem +++ b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@

[apparmor] [PATCH] Allow apt-cacher-ng to run sed.

2013-09-25 Thread intrigeri
From: intrigeri At least 0.7.18-1 uses it from time to time. --- ubuntu/13.10/usr.sbin.apt-cacher-ng | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/ubuntu/13.10/usr.sbin.apt-cacher-ng b/ubuntu/13.10/usr.sbin.apt-cacher-ng index 62f9795..5b87313 100644 --- a/ubuntu/13.10/usr.sbin.apt-cacher

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH] Allow apt-cacher-ng to run sed.

2013-09-25 Thread Steve Beattie
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:51:44AM +, intrig...@debian.org wrote: > From: intrigeri > > At least 0.7.18-1 uses it from time to time. Acked-by: Steve Beattie (and committed) Thanks! -- Steve Beattie http://NxNW.org/~steve/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- AppArmor maili

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH 2/4] Allow Totem to use GNOME keyring's PKCS#11 support.

2013-09-25 Thread Steve Beattie
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:45:41AM +, intrig...@debian.org wrote: > From: intrigeri > > --- > ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem b/ubuntu/13.10/abstractions/totem > index 8284b49..78f7904 100644 > --- a/ub

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH 2/4] Allow Totem to use GNOME keyring's PKCS#11 support.

2013-09-25 Thread intrigeri
Hi Steve, hi all, Steve Beattie wrote (25 Sep 2013 17:42:11 GMT) : >> + /usr/lib/@{multiarch}/pkcs11/*.so m, > Is there a reason not to use ? No. I've missed it thanks to the glob, combined with a poor choice of grep pattern from my part when looking for a suitable abstraction. My 1/4 patch sh

[apparmor] force-complain symlinks break cache?

2013-09-25 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, it seems using force-complain/ symlinks breaks cache usage: root@beta:/etc/apparmor.d/force-complain> time rcapparmor reload redirecting to systemctl reload apparmor real0m0.791s user0m0.004s sys 0m0.000s Now let's create force-complain symlinks for all profiles: root@beta:/

Re: [apparmor] [PATCH 2/4] Allow Totem to use GNOME keyring's PKCS#11 support.

2013-09-25 Thread Steve Beattie
Hi, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:02:51PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Steve Beattie wrote (25 Sep 2013 17:42:11 GMT) : > >> + /usr/lib/@{multiarch}/pkcs11/*.so m, > > > Is there a reason not to use ? > > No. I've missed it thanks to the glob, combined with a poor choice of > grep pattern from my par