On 2014-03-20 11:07:30, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294819
> >
> > This patch as minimal support for bare capability rules ("capability,").
> > It prevents aa.py from emitting a traceback when encount
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294819
>
> This patch as minimal support for bare capability rules ("capability,").
> It prevents aa.py from emitting a traceback when encountering such a
> rule.
>
> It only adds the ability to p
Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294819
This patch as minimal support for bare capability rules ("capability,").
It prevents aa.py from emitting a traceback when encountering such a
rule.
It only adds the ability to parse and write the bare rule. It doesn't
attempt to be clever when deleting
On 2014-03-20 13:32:14, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 19. März 2014 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> > Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294819
> >
> > This patch as minimal support for bare capability rules
> > ("capability,"). It prevents aa.py from emitting a traceback when
> > en
The proposal to merge
lp:~apparmor-dev/apparmor/apparmor-ubuntu-citrain.2.8.95-trusty into
lp:~apparmor-dev/apparmor/apparmor-ubuntu-citrain has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/apparmor/apparmor-ubuntu-citrain.2.
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 19. März 2014 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294819
>
> This patch as minimal support for bare capability rules
> ("capability,"). It prevents aa.py from emitting a traceback when
> encountering such a rule.
>
> It only adds the ability to parse
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 19. März 2014 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294825
>
> This patch is inspired by sbeattie's patch to add limited dbus rule
> support. It adds does very dumb parsing of mount rules. Basically, it
> stores mount, remount, and umount rules as raw st
On 03/19/2014 11:35 AM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:47:32AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>> Check to see if sysctl is enabled on the kernel before running the tests
>>
>> If sysctl is not enabled warn that the test is being skipped
>>
>> ---
>>
>> === modified file 'tests/regre
On 03/20/2014 12:53 AM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On ppc64el platforms, the minimum swapfile size is 640KiB. Our swap
> test aborts there because it creates a swapfile of size 512KiB. This
> patch adjusts the size to 768KiB, to satisfy ppc64el and to try
> to keep the size down for embedded and otherw
On ppc64el platforms, the minimum swapfile size is 640KiB. Our swap
test aborts there because it creates a swapfile of size 512KiB. This
patch adjusts the size to 768KiB, to satisfy ppc64el and to try
to keep the size down for embedded and otherwise limited platforms
(e.g. phones).
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 07:26:54PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294825
>
> This patch is inspired by sbeattie's patch to add limited dbus rule
> support. It adds does very dumb parsing of mount rules. Basically, it
> stores mount, remount, and umount rules as r
11 matches
Mail list logo